Barycentric Anchored Weight Search for Robust Model Merging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose Barycentric Anchored Search, a post-hoc weight-space procedure for improving fine-tuned vision models under distribution shift without additional gradient training or increased inference cost. Given a pre-trained initialization and two checkpoints fine-tuned on a source dataset, the method constructs barycentric candidate weights and performs a small derivative-free search along directions connecting each candidate to the pre-trained model. Candidate weights are selected using a small validation subset of one or more out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets; the selected model is then evaluated on the held-out portions of those datasets, on additional OOD benchmarks, and on the ImageNet validation set to quantify the robustness-accuracy trade-off. The method is inspired by simplex-based derivative-free optimization, including Nelder-Mead and Torczon multidirectional search, but is specialized to the geometry of neural network weight merging. Unlike Model Soup, which typically benefits from many fine-tuned checkpoints, and unlike Model Stock, which applies a fixed geometric merge, our approach uses only two fine-tuned checkpoints and iteratively adapts the merge using validation feedback from OOD data. Experiments with CLIP ViT-B/32 show that the proposed search substantially improves performance on held-out OOD data, including ImageNet-A, ImageNet-R, and ImageNet-Sketch, while keeping ImageNet accuracy competitive. The resulting weights also improve transfer to OOD datasets not used during candidate selection, outperforming the original fine-tuned checkpoints, naive model soups, and Model Stock in our evaluations. These results suggest that lightweight optimization in anchored weight space provides a practical alternative to fixed weight-averaging rules, geometric merging, or single-model selection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
- 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
- 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 434
8 more
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
- 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 254
- 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 150
- 2024Model Stock: All we need is just a few fine-tuned modelscited by 92
- 2023Deep Model Fusion: A Surveycited by 91
- 2022Context-Aware Robust Fine-Tuningcited by 28
- 2023Fast Trainable Projection for Robust Fine-Tuningcited by 19
- 2021When Are Solutions Connected in Deep Networks?cited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.