mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Structural Automata for Neural Semantic Parsing

arXiv 2610.13896 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural semantic parsers generate meaning representations token by token, yet well-formedness depends on references, scope, and graph relations that unfold during generation. Constrained decoding prevents locally invalid tokens but does not guarantee that a valid prefix can be completed within a fixed output-length limit. We investigate structural automata at three stages of DRS parsing (decoding, post hoc processing, and training) and additionally evaluate decoding on AMR. For decoding, we introduce accepting-path decoding (APD), which maintains a verified completion within the remaining length limit and follows the model's preferred token whenever that token can also be completed. APD guarantees an accepted output without retracting tokens. Under tight length limits, it improves Smatch++ over local masking by 5.1 and 2.4 points on DRS and by 6.4 and 3.2 points on AMR, comparable to rollback under the same limit, which retracts tokens. For post hoc processing, invalid outputs concentrate on the same inputs: eight unconstrained samples yield no valid output for 10.2% of inputs with limited training data, compared with 0.4% with full data, where filtering comes within 0.2 Smatch++ points of APD. For training, penalizing automaton-rejected tokens improves development Smatch++ by 3.6-11.0 points after 10% of training, but this advantage diminishes as cross-entropy alone reduces the probability assigned to rejected tokens from 14% to below 2% within the first sixth of training with limited data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2026.

Builds on

23 of 30 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  2. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
  3. 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 197
  4. 2024Guiding LLMs The Right Way: Fast, Non-Invasive Constrained Generationcited by 101
  5. 2018Leveraging Grammar and Reinforcement Learning for Neural Program Synthesiscited by 84
  6. 2024Automata-based constraints for language model decodingcited by 51
  7. 2017The Parallel Meaning Bank: Towards a Multilingual Corpus of Translations Annotated with Compositional Meaning Representationscited by 42
  8. 2025Type-Constrained Code Generation with Language Modelscited by 35
  9. 2024IterGen: Iterative Semantic-aware Structured LLM Generation with Backtrackingcited by 29
  10. 2023A Pseudo-Semantic Loss for Autoregressive Models with Logical Constraintscited by 22
  11. 2023SMATCH++: Standardized and Extended Evaluation of Semantic Graphscited by 21
  12. 2018Exploring Neural Methods for Parsing Discourse Representation Structurescited by 15
11 more
  1. 2025ChopChop: a Programmable Framework for Semantically Constraining the Output of Language Modelscited by 15
  2. 2022BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsingcited by 13
  3. 2018Evaluating Scoped Meaning Representationscited by 11
  4. 2023Pre-Trained Language-Meaning Models for Multilingual Parsing and Generationcited by 10
  5. 2025Grammar-Forced Translation of Natural Language to Temporal Logic using LLMscited by 8
  6. 2020An Analysis of the Utility of Explicit Negative Examples to Improve the Syntactic Abilities of Neural Language Modelscited by 7
  7. 2024Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representationscited by 6
  8. 2026Repair, Not Improvement: Decomposing Constrained Decoding in Tool-Call Abstentioncited by 4
  9. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Semantic Parsing: Improving Generalization with Lexical Knowledgecited by 2
  10. 2026Verifier-Guided Code Translation via Meta-Step Decodingcited by 2
  11. 2026Stay Within Your Bounds: Distance-Guided Decoding for Guaranteed Context-Free Grammar Compliancecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.