mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SMATCH++: Standardized and Extended Evaluation of Semantic Graphs

arXiv 2305.06993 ↗First posted 11 May 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Smatch metric is a popular method for evaluating graph distances, as is necessary, for instance, to assess the performance of semantic graph parsing systems. However, we observe some issues in the metric that jeopardize meaningful evaluation. E.g., opaque pre-processing choices can affect results, and current graph-alignment solvers do not provide us with upper-bounds. Without upper-bounds, however, fair evaluation is not guaranteed. Furthermore, adaptions of Smatch for extended tasks (e.g., fine-grained semantic similarity) are spread out, and lack a unifying framework. For better inspection, we divide the metric into three modules: pre-processing, alignment, and scoring. Examining each module, we specify its goals and diagnose potential issues, for which we discuss and test mitigation strategies. For pre-processing, we show how to fully conform to annotation guidelines that allow structurally deviating but valid graphs. For safer and enhanced alignment, we show the feasibility of optimal alignment in a standard evaluation setup, and develop a lossless graph compression method that shrinks the search space and significantly increases efficiency. For improved scoring, we propose standardized and extended metric calculation of fine-grained sub-graph meaning aspects. Our code is available at https://github.com/flipz357/smatchpp

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 48 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  2. 2019Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernelscited by 104
  3. 2019AMR Parsing as Sequence-to-Graph Transductioncited by 50
  4. 2021Structural Adapters in Pretrained Language Models for AMR-to-text Generationcited by 48
  5. 2020AMR Parsing via Graph-Sequence Iterative Inferencecited by 47
  6. 2018AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignmentcited by 36
  7. 2016An Incremental Parser for Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 34
  8. 2022SBERT studies Meaning Representations: Decomposing Sentence Embeddings into Explainable Semantic Featurescited by 33
  9. 2020Improving AMR Parsing with Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 30
  10. 2020Towards a Decomposable Metric for Explainable Evaluation of Text Generation from AMRcited by 25
  11. 2019Core Semantic First: A Top-down Approach for AMR Parsingcited by 24
  12. 2020AMR Similarity Metrics from Principlescited by 22
11 more
  1. 2021Weisfeiler-Leman in the BAMBOO: Novel AMR Graph Metrics and a Benchmark for AMR Graph Similaritycited by 16
  2. 2021Translate, then Parse! A strong baseline for Cross-Lingual AMR Parsingcited by 15
  3. 2021Ensembling Graph Predictions for AMR Parsingcited by 15
  4. 2020Promoting Graph Awareness in Linearized Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 14
  5. 2019SemBleu: A Robust Metric for AMR Parsing Evaluationcited by 12
  6. 2018Evaluating Scoped Meaning Representationscited by 11
  7. 2020Fast semantic parsing with well-typedness guaranteescited by 10
  8. 2022Better Smatch = Better Parser? AMR evaluation is not so simple anymorecited by 9
  9. 2019Universal Decompositional Semantic Parsingcited by 8
  10. 2019AMR Normalization for Fairer Evaluationcited by 3
  11. 2023Neural-Symbolic Inference for Robust Autoregressive Graph Parsing via Compositional Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 9; 2026: 4.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023"You Are An Expert Linguistic Annotator": Limits of LLMs as Analyzers of Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 15
  2. 2025Interpretable Text Embeddings and Text Similarity Explanation: A Surveycited by 12
  3. 2024Natural Language Processing RELIES on Linguisticscited by 9
  4. 2024ABEX: Data Augmentation for Low-Resource NLU via Expanding Abstract Descriptionscited by 8
  5. 2023AMR Parsing is Far from Solved: GrAPES, the Granular AMR Parsing Evaluation Suitecited by 6
  6. 2024Neural Semantic Parsing with Extremely Rich Symbolic Meaning Representationscited by 6
  7. 2024MASSIVE Multilingual Abstract Meaning Representation: A Dataset and Baselines for Hallucination Detectioncited by 4
  8. 2025Assessing the Sensitivity and Alignment of FOL Closeness Metricscited by 4
  9. 2024Scope-enhanced Compositional Semantic Parsing for DRTcited by 2
  10. 2025Survey of Abstract Meaning Representation: Then, Now, Futurecited by 2
  11. 2025When Does Meaning Backfire? Investigating the Role of AMRs in NLIcited by 1
  12. 2025A Theorem-Proving-Based Evaluation of Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 1
9 more
  1. 2023AMR4NLI: Interpretable and robust NLI measures from semantic graphscited by 0
  2. 2025HuAMR: A Hungarian AMR Parser and Datasetcited by 0
  3. 2025Is neural semantic parsing good at ellipsis resolution, or isn't it?cited by 0
  4. 2025Evaluation of Finetuned LLMs in AMR Parsingcited by 0
  5. 2025SETUP: Sentence-level English-To-Uniform Meaning Representation Parsercited by 0
  6. 2026Object Aligner: A Configurable JSON Schema Similarity Score for Graphs, Applied to LLM Prompt Optimizationcited by 0
  7. 2026Quizzing the Translation: A Prover-Grounded Evaluation Metric for NLrightarrowFOLcited by 0
  8. 2026How Reliable are AMR Parser Outputs? Uncertainty Estimation for AMR Parsingcited by 0
  9. 2026Structural Automata for Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 0