mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Lower Reconstruction Loss Hurts: Distributionally Robust Refinement for Low-Bit LLM Quantization

arXiv 2610.11226 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weight-only post-training quantization (PTQ) relies heavily on reconstruction loss minimization to preserve model quality at low precision. We show that the weights favored by minimizing this loss need not yield better model performance on new tasks. In fact, we find that lower reconstruction loss can even degrade model performance on the same calibration data. Our analysis further shows that weights with lower reconstruction loss on calibration data can have higher loss than other weights when the distribution of input activations changes. Motivated by these observations and our analysis, we propose Distributionally Robust Quantization (DRQ), a post-hoc refinement process that minimizes worst-case reconstruction loss over a constrained set of input activation distributions. DRQ refines the integer codes representing quantized weights within the existing quantization grid, keeping quantization parameters and inference operators unchanged. Extensive experiments show that DRQ improves models quantized by six representative PTQ methods, including AWQ, GPTQ, and ParoQuant, and delivers gains across both dense and mixture-of-experts large language models. These results establish DRQ as a general post-hoc refinement framework for weight-only PTQ, achieving better downstream performance without adding inference overhead.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 46 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  7. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  8. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  9. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  10. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  11. 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 471
  12. 2023QuIP: 2-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models With Guaranteescited by 414
5 more
  1. 2019WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scalecited by 204
  2. 2026DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: Pushing the Limits of KV Cache Compressioncited by 76
  3. 2025GuidedQuant: Large Language Model Quantization via Exploiting End Loss Guidancecited by 32
  4. 2026CoreQ: Learning-Free Mismatch Correction and Successive Rounding for Quantizationcited by 6
  5. 2026Saliency-Aware Regularized Quantization Calibration for Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Devil Is in the Reconstruction Loss Scale: Rethinking Optimization in LLM Quantization
  2. 2026Scale Sensitivity in Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization: Curvature of the Quantization Error Landscape
  3. 2026D2Quant: Accurate Low-bit Post-Training Weight Quantization for LLMs
  4. 2026Sliced-Wasserstein Distribution Alignment Loss Improves the Ultra-Low-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models
  5. 2024Understanding the Difficulty of Low-Precision Post-Training Quantization for LLMs
  6. 2024Taming Sensitive Weights : Noise Perturbation Fine-tuning for Robust LLM Quantization
  7. 2026DAQ: Delta-Aware Quantization for Post-Training LLM Weight Compression
  8. 2026ReQuant: Fixed-Grid Discrete Refinement for Post-Training Quantization