Scale Sensitivity in Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization: Curvature of the Quantization Error Landscape
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training quantization (PTQ) methods in the GPTQ family minimize a layer-wise reconstruction error on a uniform grid whose scale must be chosen; the common max-based choice degrades sharply at low bit-widths. We study how sensitive this objective is to the scale. For a layer with i.i.d. Gaussian weights and calibration activations of sufficiently large effective rank, we prove that, as the width grows, the normalized round-to-nearest loss converges with high probability, uniformly over all scales, to the mean-squared error of a uniform quantizer applied to a standard Gaussian; we verify the effective-rank condition for wide, randomly initialized MLPs with odd Lipschitz activations and isotropic Gaussian calibration data. The limiting objective has a unique nondegenerate minimizer, whose scale decreases strictly with the number of levels and whose curvature with respect to relative scale errors decays approximately exponentially with the bit-width. GPTQ experiments on five LLMs show the same trend: the scale rule changes perplexity substantially at 2--3 bits and negligibly from 6 bits on, and a local measure of GPTQ scale sensitivity decreases with bit-width in line with the Gaussian curvature. The Gaussian-optimal scale fails on raw weights; after Hadamard incoherence processing it matches the best searched rule at 3 bits and above without any search, but remains clearly worse at 2 bits.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
9 of 32 references.
References · 9
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
- 2021BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstructioncited by 479
- 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 472
- 2025GPTAQ: Efficient Finetuning-Free Quantization for Asymmetric Calibrationcited by 60
- 2025BitNet b1.58 2B4T Technical Reportcited by 38
- 2026Rethinking Residual Errors in Compensation-based LLM Quantizationcited by 7
- 2026Optimal Post-Training Quantization Scales and Where to Find Themcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Gradient-Based Post-Training Quantization: Challenging the Status Quo
- 2026When Lower Reconstruction Loss Hurts: Distributionally Robust Refinement for Low-Bit LLM Quantization
- 2025Provable Post-Training Quantization: Theoretical Analysis of OPTQ and Qronos
- 2025The Geometry of LLM Quantization: GPTQ as Babai's Nearest Plane Algorithm
- 2026Understanding Quantization-Aware Training: Gradients at Quantized Weights Bias to the Low-Loss Basin
- 2026The Devil Is in the Reconstruction Loss Scale: Rethinking Optimization in LLM Quantization
- 2026GPTQ-intrinsic LoRA: A Near-optimal Algorithm for Low-precision Quantization with Low-rank Adaptation
- 2024COMQ: A Backpropagation-Free Algorithm for Post-Training Quantization