mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Higher-Order Action Supervision Makes A Strong Policy Class

arXiv 2610.11175 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Imitation learning methods also fits: Safe offline RL

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Modern data-driven decision-making methods, such as imitation learning (IL) and reinforcement learning (RL), have achieved great success in solving many complex tasks. However, these methods often suffer from serious control instability and robustness issues when applied in real-world applications such as robotics and autonomous driving, posing notable challenges for their practical deployment. We argue that this instability issue stems largely from their limitations in solely supervising and optimizing zeroth-order actions (i.e., the action labels), failing to account for higher-order action dynamics and temporal consistency. In this paper, we show that simultaneously supervising both zeroth- and first-order actions can dramatically enhance policies' performance and control robustness. To achieve this, we introduce a novel and elegant loss scheme supported by formal theoretical guarantees that can equip any off-the-shelf policy model (e.g., deterministic, stochastic, or flow policies) with the capability for higher-order action supervision, without requiring any structural modifications. Moreover, our proposed method can serve as a lightweight plug-and-play module that seamlessly integrates with a broad spectrum of existing offline RL frameworks. Extensive evaluations on OGBench and D4RL demonstrate that our approach yields substantial performance and robustness improvements across a wide range of continuous control environments. Notably, our method can also enhance policies' out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization capability in the challenging low-data regime, making it an ideal tool in tackling many real-world control problems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation learning methods, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 8 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2026.

Builds on

8 of 80 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
  4. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
  5. 2022Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesiscited by 1,061
  6. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 662
  7. 2022Diffusion Policies as an Expressive Policy Class for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 562
  8. 2023IDQL: Implicit Q-Learning as an Actor-Critic Method with Diffusion Policiescited by 325

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Action Residuals: Real-World Robot Policy Steering via Bottleneck Latent Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Enabling Stateful Behaviors for Diffusion-based Policy Learning
  3. 2026Support-Constrained RL Enables Real-World Policy Improvement without Real-World Experience
  4. 2025Action-Constrained Imitation Learning
  5. 2019On-Policy Robot Imitation Learning from a Converging Supervisor
  6. 2026Don't Throw Away the Tail: Action Upcycling for Policy Acceleration
  7. 2020NEARL: Non-Explicit Action Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Control
  8. 2025The Pitfalls of Imitation Learning when Actions are Continuous