mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Diagnosing and Recovering from Observation-Space Shift at Long-Horizon Skill Seams

arXiv 2610.10810 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.RO cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Long-horizon robotic manipulation is often built by chaining independently trained skills. Although each skill can be reliable in isolation, performance degrades sharply when skills are chained: each downstream skill must start from the state its predecessor leaves behind rather than from its training distribution. We study this failure mode, Observation-Space Shift (OSS), and ask what causes these skill-seam failures. Using privileged simulator resets, we find that the dominant shift comes from displaced scene state (e.g., an open drawer or secondary objects left behind by earlier skills), not from the robot's joint configuration or the object the downstream skill manipulates. To test this diagnosis, we build a fully learned detect-restore-resume system: a task-progress monitor detects the stall, a learned policy restores the displaced scene components, and seam-robust fine-tuning lets the skill resume. It recovers the seam where every tested alternative fails, which we treat as evidence for the diagnosis rather than as a general-purpose method. On the BOSS-44 benchmark, the system improves full-chain success from 7.6% to 26.5%, a 3.5x improvement over the base policy and 51% of a privileged restoration oracle, whereas best-of-K resampling, a Diffusion Policy, and world-model baselines fail to recover from the evaluated seam states. On a real Franka arm running a fine-tuned π0.5 policy, the same monitor is limited by exterior-camera observability, yet closing the loop still recovers some otherwise-terminal failures, motivating wrist and gripper sensing. These results suggest that some long-horizon composition failures are better addressed by restoring the scene before resuming the policy than by retrying from an off-support state.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

10 of 43 references.

References · 10

  1. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  2. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  3. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
  4. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,297
  5. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  6. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
  7. 2026Cosmos Policy: Fine-Tuning Video Models for Visuomotor Control and Planningcited by 274
  8. 2024STRAP: Robot Sub-Trajectory Retrieval for Augmented Policy Learningcited by 42
  9. 2025RaC: Robot Learning for Long-Horizon Tasks by Scaling Recovery and Correctioncited by 35
  10. 2024RecoveryChaining: Learning Local Recovery Policies for Robust Manipulationcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025BOSS: Benchmark for Observation Space Shift in Long-Horizon Task
  2. 2026Foresight: Failure Detection for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation with Action-Conditioned World Model Latents
  3. 2026Behavior-Skill: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Policies in Long-Horizon Tasks
  4. 2026Triplet2Track: A Hierarchical System with Object-Centric Representations for Reliable Long-Horizon Manipulation
  5. 2026FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?
  6. 2026ProcVLM: Learning Procedure-Grounded Progress Rewards for Robotic Manipulation
  7. 2026Learning to Act under Visual Interruptions with Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2026LIBERO-MAX: Do Robot Policies Adapt When the World Changes?