mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RecoveryChaining: Learning Local Recovery Policies for Robust Manipulation

arXiv 2410.13979 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2024cs.RO cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model-based planners and controllers are commonly used to solve complex manipulation problems as they can efficiently optimize diverse objectives and generalize to long horizon tasks. However, they often fail during deployment due to noisy actuation, partial observability and imperfect models. To enable a robot to recover from such failures, we propose to use hierarchical reinforcement learning to learn a recovery policy. The recovery policy is triggered when a failure is detected based on sensory observations and seeks to take the robot to a state from which it can complete the task using the nominal model-based controllers. Our approach, called RecoveryChaining, uses a hybrid action space, where the model-based controllers are provided as additional nominal options which allows the recovery policy to decide how to recover, when to switch to a nominal controller and which controller to switch to even with sparse rewards. We evaluate our approach in three multi-step manipulation tasks with sparse rewards, where it learns significantly more robust recovery policies than those learned by baselines. We successfully transfer recovery policies learned in simulation to a physical robot to demonstrate the feasibility of sim-to-real transfer with our method.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2024.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  4. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
  5. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 511
  6. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 175
  7. 2019A Review of Robot Learning for Manipulation: Challenges, Representations, and Algorithmscited by 142
  8. 2023Learning Agile Soccer Skills for a Bipedal Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 133
  9. 2021Augmenting Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Primitives for Diverse Manipulation Taskscited by 78
  10. 2022Learning to Grasp the Ungraspable with Emergent Extrinsic Dexteritycited by 28
  11. 2022Back to the Manifold: Recovering from Out-of-Distribution Statescited by 20
  12. 2018Robustness via Retrying: Closed-Loop Robotic Manipulation with Self-Supervised Learningcited by 19
6 more
  1. 2020Learning to Compose Hierarchical Object-Centric Controllers for Robotic Manipulationcited by 17
  2. 2021Untangling Dense Non-Planar Knots by Learning Manipulation Features and Recovery Policiescited by 11
  3. 2021LS3: Latent Space Safe Sets for Long-Horizon Visuomotor Control of Sparse Reward Iterative Taskscited by 10
  4. 2022Temporal Logic Imitation: Learning Plan-Satisficing Motion Policies from Demonstrationscited by 10
  5. 2022Efficient Recovery Learning using Model Predictive Meta-Reasoningcited by 8
  6. 2020Learning Skills to Patch Plans Based on Inaccurate Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MAGMA-GEN: Validated Recovery Supervision from Ambiguous Failures via Counterfactual Re-Execution
  2. 2026Kintsugi-VLA: Turning Failed Robot Rollouts into Recovery Data through Interventional Recoverability
  3. 2018Constraint Estimation and Derivative-Free Recovery for Robot Learning from Demonstrations
  4. 2024Adaptable Recovery Behaviors in Robotics: A Behavior Trees and Motion Generators(BTMG) Approach for Failure Management
  5. 2026Recover, Discover, Plan: Learning Skills and Concepts from Robot Failures
  6. 2024Guided Reinforcement Learning for Robust Multi-Contact Loco-Manipulation
  7. 2026Is Online Interaction Necessary for Recovery? A Minimalist Approach to Robust Planning via Perturbation ↗
  8. 2026SafeExplorer: An Unbiased Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning with Recovery Interventions