mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

JevForest: Path Voting for Budgeted Feature Acquisition

arXiv 2610.10615 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Choosing which information to observe is central to prediction under limited observation budgets. We study JevForest, a feature acquisition policy that aggregates path-dependent proposals from bootstrapped trees, weights them by global training information gain, and predicts from the acquired values with a shared masked classifier. An online implementation queries Jev for semantic answers selected by this policy. On small balanced held-out samples, four-question forest acquisition achieves accuracy 0.729 on AG News (n=48), compared with 0.667 for a static gain ranking and 0.583 for random ordering. On TREC (n=24), the ordering reverses: forest accuracy is 0.667, compared with 0.750 and 0.833. Asking all eight questions in one batch yields higher accuracy at lower measured cost and latency than four sequential forest queries; direct Jev classification matches the batch accuracy while costing less. Offline MiniBooNE experiments yield accuracy 0.845±0.010 at ten features and 0.885±0.008 at forty features over three jointly varying data and forest seeds (mean ± sample standard deviation). A companion Newton boosting implementation provides preliminary full-feature synthetic results. These exploratory findings establish a working Jev acquisition workflow but do not support a general advantage for path voting: its value depends on the task, predictor, and the distinction between question budgets and actual query costs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

4 of 18 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  2. 2025AFABench: A Generic Framework for Benchmarking Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 7
  3. 2026Evaluating and Benchmarking the System One Model Jevcited by 3
  4. 2026System One Models for Wireless Decision-Making:Applications and Performance Evaluationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.