AFABench: A Generic Framework for Benchmarking Active Feature Acquisition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many real-world scenarios, acquiring all features of a data instance can be expensive or impractical due to monetary cost, latency, or privacy concerns. Active Feature Acquisition (AFA) addresses this challenge by dynamically selecting a subset of informative features for each data instance, trading predictive performance against acquisition cost. While numerous methods have been proposed for AFA, ranging from myopic information-theoretic strategies to non-myopic reinforcement learning approaches, fair and systematic evaluation of these methods has been hindered by a lack of standardized benchmarks. In this paper, we introduce AFABench, the first benchmark framework for AFA. Our benchmark includes a diverse set of synthetic and real-world datasets, supports a wide range of acquisition policies, and provides a modular design that enables easy integration of new methods and tasks. We implement and evaluate representative algorithms from all major categories, including static, myopic, and reinforcement learning-based approaches. To test the lookahead capabilities of AFA policies, we introduce a novel synthetic dataset, CUBE-NM, designed to expose the limitations of myopic selection. Our results highlight key trade-offs between different AFA strategies and provide actionable insights for future research. The benchmark code is available at: https://github.com/Linusaronsson/AFA-Benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.
Builds on
18 of 48 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2015Order Matters: Sequence to sequence for setscited by 236
- 2018EDDI: Efficient Dynamic Discovery of High-Value Information with Partial VAEcited by 85
- 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Surveycited by 81
- 2023TorchRL: A data-driven decision-making library for PyTorchcited by 59
- 2023Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 54
- 2016Feature Selection: A Data Perspectivecited by 50
- 2023Variational Information Pursuit for Interpretable Predictionscited by 25
6 more
- 2019Classification with Costly Features as a Sequential Decision-Making Problemcited by 23
- 2023Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 20
- 2019Opportunistic Learning: Budgeted Cost-Sensitive Learning from Data Streamscited by 18
- 2023Acquisition Conditioned Oracle for Nongreedy Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 17
- 2025A Survey on Active Feature Acquisition Strategiescited by 16
- 2014Optimal Value of Information in Graphical Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition via Pathwise Policy Gradientscited by 1
- 2026Zero-Shot Active Feature Acquisition via LLM-Elicitationcited by 0
- 2026Learning Source Acquisition Policies by Offline Planningcited by 0
- 2026When Does Test-Time Physical Diagnosis Pay? A Frozen Policy Buys Evidence It Never Readscited by 0
- 2026When Does Synergy Help Active Feature Acquisition? A PID-Based Studycited by 0
- 2026Active Feature Acquisition With Incomplete Training Datacited by 0
- 2026JevForest: Path Voting for Budgeted Feature Acquisitioncited by 0
- 2026JevForest: Path Voting for Budgeted Feature Acquisition7 Oct 2026
- 2026Active Feature Acquisition With Incomplete Training Data26 Sep 2026
- 2026When Does Synergy Help Active Feature Acquisition? A PID-Based Study26 Sep 2026
- 2026When Does Test-Time Physical Diagnosis Pay? A Frozen Policy Buys Evidence It Never Reads14 Sep 2026
- 2026Learning Source Acquisition Policies by Offline Planning13 Sep 2026
- 2026Zero-Shot Active Feature Acquisition via LLM-Elicitation17 Jun 2026
- 2026Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition via Pathwise Policy Gradients6 May 2026