AI Safety Considerations for Agents With Limited Time to Act
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the wake of the increasingly public discussion about AI alignment, recent work has tried to propose specific AI architectures that behave safely. However, the proposed arguments that seemingly demonstrate proved alignment mostly neglect the environment the agent needs to act in. We discuss theoretical bounds for agent-agnostic safety guarantees in environments that can only be partially observed and within which an action is required within limited time. We introduce two realistic scenarios, one with an infinite state space and one with signal mixture. In these scenarios, we prove that even a perfect agent cannot guarantee safe behaviour. It will be argued that for any proof of AI safety or alignment, the environment and associated safe actions need to be specifically considered together with the agent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.
Builds on
5 of 14 references.
References · 5
- 2024Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systemscited by 94
- 2023Provably safe systems: the only path to controllable AGIcited by 29
- 2025The Alignment Trap: Complexity Barrierscited by 2
- 2015Unbounded Lookahead in WMSO+U Gamescited by 1
- 2024On the Undecidability of Artificial Intelligence Alignment: Machines that Haltcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.