mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Closed-Loop Non-Asymptotic Convergence Analysis of PPO with Learned Critics and Clipping

arXiv 2610.10273 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite its widespread use, Proximal Policy Optimization with clipping (PPO-Clip) remains difficult to tune, and the interactions among critic learning, clipping, and rollout reuse remain incompletely understood. We develop a non-asymptotic analysis of PPO-Clip as a closed-loop actor--critic system. It captures actor--critic coupling, nonsmooth probability-ratio clipping, finite-batch reuse, and predictable early stopping under explicit coverage and critic regularity assumptions, using raw GAE and Monte Carlo critic targets. Our synchronous and asynchronous guarantees jointly characterize policy stationarity and the tracking accuracy of the learned critic, with explicit dependence on algorithmic parameters. A sufficient coupling condition gives optimization, critic tracking, clipping, and finite-batch errors a common amplification bound. The asynchronous result also requires a delay-dependent critic stepsize restriction; violating these conditions does not establish divergence. For finite layered MDPs with tabular critics, a uniform bound on the actual clipped-gradient class replaces complete-trajectory counting. A verified growing-horizon family has polynomial sample complexity, and a two-time-scale schedule gives O(T-2/5) stationarity and critic-tracking bounds with explicit fresh-rollout accounting. These results together advance our understanding about PPO and provide theoretical guidance in tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

References · 21

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2025AReaL: A Large-Scale Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Reasoningcited by 234
  5. 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
  6. 2024Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learningcited by 158
  7. 2024ODIN: Disentangled Reward Mitigates Hacking in RLHFcited by 133
  8. 2025Reward Shaping to Mitigate Reward Hacking in RLHFcited by 88
  9. 2015Massively Parallel Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 80
  10. 2019Neural Proximal/Trust Region Policy Optimization Attains Globally Optimal Policycited by 42
  11. 2023Improving Generalization of Alignment with Human Preferences through Group Invariant Learningcited by 25
  12. 2025CE-GPPO: Coordinating Entropy via Gradient-Preserving Clipping Policy Optimization in Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
9 more
  1. 2022You May Not Need Ratio Clipping in PPOcited by 19
  2. 2025The Energy Loss Phenomenon in RLHF: A New Perspective on Mitigating Reward Hackingcited by 18
  3. 2025It's Not You, It's Clipping: A Soft Trust-Region via Probability Smoothing for LLM RLcited by 6
  4. 2021Neural PPO-Clip Attains Global Optimality: A Hinge Loss Perspectivecited by 4
  5. 2026An Approximate Ascent Approach To Prove Convergence of PPOcited by 3
  6. 2023Clipped-Objective Policy Gradients for Pessimistic Policy Optimizationcited by 2
  7. 2025Non-Asymptotic Global Convergence of PPO-Clipcited by 2
  8. 2021CIM-PPO:Proximal Policy Optimization with Liu-Correntropy Induced Metriccited by 1
  9. 2025Sampling Complexity of TD and PPO in RKHScited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.