mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Could AI Eliminate Humanity? A Failure-Mode Analysis of Civilizational Risk

arXiv 2610.08878 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CY cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article develops a failure-mode framework for analyzing how advanced artificial intelligence could contribute to human extinction, irreversible civilizational collapse, or permanent human disempowerment. The central thesis is that catastrophic AI risk does not require consciousness, hostility, or an explicit intention to harm humanity. Instead, risk may arise through several distinct but interacting pathways, including autonomous misalignment, harmful human use, organizational failure, and competitive deployment. The severity of these pathways depends on factors such as capability, autonomy, external access, persistence, institutional safeguards, and the preservation of recovery capacity. The analysis is deliberately non-operational: it identifies causal conditions, empirically tractable intermediate quantities, and defensive research questions rather than procedures for causing harm.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  5. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  6. 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 867
  7. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 258
  8. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 222
  9. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 177
  10. 2020Open Problems in Cooperative AIcited by 168
  11. 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 165
  12. 2018Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Lawcited by 149
5 more
  1. 2019Optimal Policies Tend to Seek Powercited by 119
  2. 2022Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?cited by 105
  3. 2019To regulate or not: a social dynamics analysis of the race for AI supremacycited by 2
  4. 2026Falling Behind Drives Unsafe Development in an Idealised AI Race Experimentcited by 1
  5. 2026The 2026 Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Prioritiescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.