Agentic Design Space Exploration for Joint Hardware Configuration Selection and Mapping of AI Inference Workloads on Heterogeneous Edge SoCs
New in LLM agents and tool use; no direction yet. LLM agents and tool use
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern edge Systems-on-Chip (SoCs) integrate heterogeneous processing units (PUs) such as CPUs, GPUs, and NPUs, each with distinct performance and energy characteristics. Deploying AI inference workloads on them under real-time latency and energy constraints requires jointly mapping workloads to PUs and configuring each PU (e.g., selecting the number of active cores and the operating frequency). This joint space grows combinatorially, making exhaustive search infeasible. Most prior work on design space exploration (DSE) applies black-box optimization (BBO) such as evolutionary search, where each evaluation returns only aggregate metrics such as latency and energy. Recent LLM-guided DSE relies on the same sparse feedback. We observe that this limits its efficiency: it offers no insight into the design space or the reasons a design choice performs the way it does, and it leaves the reasoning abilities of LLMs largely unused. We present TraceDSE, an agentic DSE flow that performs joint workload mapping and PU configuration selection for AI inference on heterogeneous SoCs. TraceDSE is an iterative proposer-critic loop driven by richer feedback in the form of system execution traces. The LLM proposer agent generates candidate mappings and PU configurations for hardware evaluation. The LLM critic agent, equipped with programmatic trace-analysis tools, analyzes the traces to identify bottlenecks and suggest targeted refinements. This loop yields deeper insight into each design point, higher-quality decisions, and a more effective search. Across four AI inference workloads (models of varying complexity and a multi-model pipeline) on an Intel Meteor Lake SoC, TraceDSE consistently outperforms two state-of-the-art BBO tools, improving Pareto frontier hypervolume by up to 35% over NSGA-II and up to 68% over Bayesian optimization, while requiring ~6-9x fewer hardware evaluations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ORFS-agent: Tool-Using Agents for Chip Design Optimization
- 2026From LLM to Silicon: RL-Driven ASIC Architecture Exploration for On-Device AI Inference
- 2026AgentDSE: Reasoning-Augmented Architectural Design Space Exploration
- 2026Agentic Hardware Design as Repository-Level Code Evolution
- 2025Towards Understanding, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Execution: A CPU-Centric Perspective
- 2026Agentic Architect: An Agentic AI Framework for Architecture Design Exploration and Optimization
- 2025Agent.xpu: Efficient Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workloads on Heterogeneous SoC
- 2025Mozart: A Chiplet Ecosystem-Accelerator Codesign Framework for Composable Bespoke Application Specific Integrated Circuits