mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Anchor Divergence for Semantic Geometry in Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2610.06919 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper concerns how semantic context determines geometry in learned vector representations. Similarity is typically measured using cosine similarity, which provides a single fixed geometry. Semantic similarity, however, is inherently context dependent: two images may be similar because they depict the same object, share a visual style, or are relevant to the same clinical finding. We show that contrastive representations naturally encompass a family of geometries that can be specialized to particular semantic structure. The key idea is to use an interplay between contrastive learning, exponential families, and information geometry to establish a correspondence between probability distributions over "anchors" and Bregman geometries on the representation space. We use this correspondence to define "Anchor Divergences", a method for specifying context-specific semantic geometries on fixed representations. Under this correspondence, modeling the anchor distribution models the geometry itself. Experiments on retrieval show that anchor divergences provide an effective and efficient way to specify context-specific semantic similarity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

27 of 41 references.

References · 27

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  4. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  6. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  7. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  8. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classificationcited by 362
  9. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 321
  10. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 226
  11. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
  12. 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
15 more
  1. 2018A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networkscited by 186
  2. 2023Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval with Textual Inversioncited by 176
  3. 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 159
  4. 2022Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Spacecited by 142
  5. 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Modelscited by 119
  6. 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 119
  7. 2020Revisiting Training Strategies and Generalization Performance in Deep Metric Learningcited by 100
  8. 2018A Zero-Shot Framework for Sketch-based Image Retrievalcited by 71
  9. 2025Meta CLIP 2: A Worldwide Scaling Recipecited by 64
  10. 2025Cross the Gap: Exposing the Intra-modal Misalignment in CLIP via Modality Inversioncited by 43
  11. 2024Leveraging Cross-Modal Neighbor Representation for Improved CLIP Classificationcited by 19
  12. 2025CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representationcited by 14
  13. 2023Parts of Speech-Grounded Subspaces in Vision-Language Modelscited by 11
  14. 2026The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and Steeringcited by 11
  15. 2024Leveraging Foundation Models for Content-Based Image Retrieval in Radiologycited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.