mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EMG-FM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Foundation Model Transfer and Adaptation on Electromyography

arXiv 2610.06450 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models (FMs) are increasingly being developed for general time series and physiological signals, yet their transferability to downstream physiological tasks remains poorly understood. This question is particularly challenging for electromyography (EMG), where signal distributions vary substantially across users, sensing configurations, acquisition hardware, and downstream tasks. We introduce EMG-FM-Bench, a systematic benchmark for studying foundation-model transfer and adaptation on EMG. EMG-FM-Bench unifies 20 public datasets with over 1 million EMG segments and evaluates nine pretrained foundation models across four questions: how pretrained models perform when frozen or fully fine-tuned, how much pretraining helps compared with training the same model from scratch, how well models generalize to new users with limited labeled data, and how performance changes across different EMG tasks. Across the benchmark, linear probing provides useful information about pretrained representations, but full fine-tuning can substantially change downstream EMG performance. Comparing each pretrained model with the same model trained from scratch shows that the benefit of pretraining varies substantially across models and is not universal. Performance decreases when models are evaluated on new users, while five-shot adaptation improves macro-F1 in 70.2% of evaluated model-dataset combinations but recovers only part of the lost performance. Model performance is highly consistent between upper- and lower-limb classification and remains strongly correlated with continuous EMG-to-text decoding. Together, these results provide a systematic view of when pretrained time-series models transfer effectively to EMG and how their performance depends on fine-tuning, user variation, and downstream task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

16 of 61 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  2. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
  3. 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,058
  4. 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 759
  5. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
  6. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 482
  7. 2024Large Brain Model for Learning Generic Representations with Tremendous EEG Data in BCIcited by 327
  8. 2024GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark For General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluationcited by 212
  9. 2025Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecastingcited by 194
  10. 2024UniTS: A Unified Multi-Task Time Series Modelcited by 94
  11. 2024PaPaGei: Open Foundation Models for Optical Physiological Signalscited by 69
  12. 2023ECGBERT: Understanding Hidden Language of ECGs with Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 12
4 more
  1. 2025TinyMyo: a Tiny Foundation Model for Flexible EMG Signal Processing at the Edgecited by 7
  2. 2026Brain4FMs: A Benchmark of Foundation Models for Electrical Brain Signalcited by 7
  3. 2026Channel Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models: A Systematic Benchmark Across Architectures, Tasks, and Training Regimescited by 5
  4. 2025Generalist vs Specialist Time Series Foundation Models: Investigating Potential Emergent Behaviors in Assessing Human Health Using PPG Signalscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.