mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Time-series Foundation Models for Predictive Control: The Role of Excitation

arXiv 2610.06447 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying model predictive control (MPC) requires constructing or identifying a predictive model for each target system. Time-series foundation models (TSFMs) offer an attractive option thanks to strong zero-shot forecasting capabilities across systems. However, low forecast error does not guarantee that a TSFM captures the system's response to the alternative actions considered by the controller. We study this gap using residential heat-pump control as a test bed, measuring the agreement between predicted and ground-truth effects of control interventions. Importantly, we find that TSFMs can recover the system's input-response relationship when the context contains sufficient independent control excitation. Common fine-tuning pipelines and feature smoothing reduce, but do not eliminate, the need for in-context excitation. Our results indicate that current TSFMs used for predictive control require sufficiently informative control variation in the inference context. Initial closed-loop results show promise for shorter context windows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
  2. 2025Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecastingcited by 194
  3. 2023TimeGPT-1cited by 158
  4. 2025From Tables to Time: Extending TabPFN-v2 to Time Series Forecastingcited by 60
  5. 2026ThermoForce: A Physics-Structured Interventional World Model for Building HVAC Controlcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.