Time-series Foundation Models for Predictive Control: The Role of Excitation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deploying model predictive control (MPC) requires constructing or identifying a predictive model for each target system. Time-series foundation models (TSFMs) offer an attractive option thanks to strong zero-shot forecasting capabilities across systems. However, low forecast error does not guarantee that a TSFM captures the system's response to the alternative actions considered by the controller. We study this gap using residential heat-pump control as a test bed, measuring the agreement between predicted and ground-truth effects of control interventions. Importantly, we find that TSFMs can recover the system's input-response relationship when the context contains sufficient independent control excitation. Common fine-tuning pipelines and feature smoothing reduce, but do not eliminate, the need for in-context excitation. Our results indicate that current TSFMs used for predictive control require sufficiently informative control variation in the inference context. Initial closed-loop results show promise for shorter context windows.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
5 of 20 references.
References · 5
- 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
- 2025Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecastingcited by 194
- 2023TimeGPT-1cited by 158
- 2025From Tables to Time: Extending TabPFN-v2 to Time Series Forecastingcited by 60
- 2026ThermoForce: A Physics-Structured Interventional World Model for Building HVAC Controlcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.