mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning While Scheduling Jobs under Context-Dependent Service Rates: An Anytime Rate-Optimal Algorithm

arXiv 2610.06006 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study contextual queueing bandits, where a learner schedules jobs while learning unknown service rates modeled by logistic functions of job-server features. Performance is measured by queue length regret, the expected excess queue length at round t relative to an oracle that knows the service rates. Existing decaying-regret guarantees either have a suboptimal decay rate or require a known fixed horizon. They also assume context-wise slack and a strictly positive minimum eigenvalue of the feature covariance. In this paper, we propose WISE (Widest Interval Selection with Elimination), achieving rate-optimal widetildemathcal O(t-1/2) queue length regret at every sufficiently large time without knowing the horizon. We assume capacity slack, meaning that expected incoming workload under best-server service is below service capacity, and impose no covariance lower bound. Our analysis uses a workload potential measuring the expected service attempts needed by waiting jobs on their best servers. Its drift on nonempty rounds combines a negative term ensured by capacity slack with errors from suboptimal service choices. Then an elliptical potential count bounds how often WISE selects wide confidence intervals, thereby limiting the number of rounds with large service errors. We also sharpen the arrival-rate dependence of an existing lower bound and make its dependence on feature dimension and server count explicit. We prove another lower bound that quantifies the increase in regret as the normalized capacity slack decreases; to our knowledge, this is the first such lower bound for CQB. Simulations show small regret even when context-wise slack fails.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

14 of 44 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019Scheduling with Predictions and the Price of Mispredictioncited by 47
  2. 2024A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Banditscited by 29
  3. 2025Improved Regret Analysis in Gaussian Process Bandits: Optimality for Noiseless Reward, RKHS norm, and Non-Stationary Variancecited by 15
  4. 2021Uniform Bounds for Scheduling with Job Size Estimatescited by 12
  5. 2018On Learning the cμ Rule in Single and Parallel Server Networkscited by 11
  6. 2024Learning to Defer in Congested Systems: The AI-Human Interplaycited by 6
  7. 2024Design and Scheduling of an AI-based Queueing Systemcited by 4
  8. 2026Queue Length Regret Bounds for Contextual Queueing Banditscited by 4
  9. 2026Learning to Route and Schedule LLMs from User Retrials via Contextual Queueing Banditscited by 3
  10. 2026Batched Kernelized Bandits: Refinements and Extensionscited by 3
  11. 2025Bandit-Based Rate Adaptation for a Single-Server Queuecited by 2
  12. 2026Practical and Optimal Algorithm for Linear Contextual Bandits with Rare Parameter Updatescited by 2
2 more
  1. 2026Algorithm for Contextual Queueing Bandits with Rate-Optimal Queue Length Regretcited by 2
  2. 2026Logistic Bandits with tildeO(√dT) Regret without Context Diversity Assumptionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.