Learning to Defer in Congested Systems: The AI-Human Interplay
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-stakes applications rely on combining Artificial Intelligence (AI) and humans for responsive and reliable decision making. For example, content moderation in social media platforms often employs an AI-human pipeline to promptly remove policy violations without jeopardizing legitimate content. A typical heuristic estimates the risk of incoming content and uses fixed thresholds to decide whether to auto-delete the content (classification) and whether to send it for human review (admission). This approach can be inefficient as it disregards the uncertainty in AI's estimation, the time-varying element of content arrivals and human review capacity, and the selective sampling in the online dataset (humans only review content filtered by the AI). In this paper, we introduce a model to capture such an AI-human interplay. In this model, the AI observes contextual information for incoming jobs, makes classification and admission decisions, and schedules admitted jobs for human review. During these reviews, humans observe a job's true cost and may overturn an erroneous AI classification decision. These reviews also serve as new data to train the AI but are delayed due to congestion in the human review system. The objective is to minimize the costs of eventually misclassified jobs. We propose a near-optimal learning algorithm that carefully balances the classification loss from a selectively sampled dataset, the idiosyncratic loss of non-reviewed jobs, and the delay loss of having congestion in the human review system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for online learning in contextual queueing systems. Moreover, numerical experiments based on online comment datasets show that our algorithm can substantially reduce the number of misclassifications compared to existing content moderation practice.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variationscited by 12
- 2025Designing Algorithmic Delegates: The Role of Indistinguishability in Human-AI Handoffcited by 5
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Expertscited by 4
- 2026Human-AI Teaming Through the Lens of Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026When Should a Human Take Back Control? Optimal Delegation under Turbulent AI Riskcited by 0
- 2026When Should a Human Take Back Control? Optimal Delegation under Turbulent AI Risk25 Sep 2026
- 2026Human-AI Teaming Through the Lens of Calibration9 Jun 2026
- 2025Designing Algorithmic Delegates: The Role of Indistinguishability in Human-AI Handoff3 Jun 2025
- 2025Lost in Moderation: How Commercial Content Moderation APIs Over- and Under-Moderate Group-Targeted Hate Speech and Linguistic Variations3 Mar 2025
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts18 Nov 2024