mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Logistic Bandits with tildeO(√dT) Regret without Context Diversity Assumptions

arXiv 2604.22161 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the K-armed logistic bandit problem, where at each round, the agent observes K feature vectors associated with K actions. Existing approaches that achieve a rate-optimal tildeO(√dT) regret bound rely heavily on context diversity assumptions, such as strict positivity of the minimum eigenvalue of a context covariance matrix. These assumptions, however, impose strong restrictions on the context process, as they rule out the situation where the context vectors are concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. In this paper, we propose SupSplitLog, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first algorithm for logistic bandits that achieves tildeO(√dT) regret without any context diversity assumption. The key idea is to split the collected samples into two disjoint subsets when constructing estimators; one is used to compute an initial-point estimator, while the other is used to apply a Newton-type one-step correction procedure. The splitting rule is carefully designed to balance the accuracy requirements of the initial-point estimator and the one-step correction procedure. Moreover, SupSplitLog strictly improves on the existing algorithms in terms of the dependence on dimension d in the regret upper bound. Furthermore, SupSplitLog can be adapted simply to deduce a regret bound that grows with a data-dependent complexity measure, avoiding a direct dependence on d, which is favorable when the context vectors are concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. We also provide experimental results that demonstrate numerically the superiority of our algorithm, validating the theoretical results.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.

Builds on

34 of 48 references.

References · 34

  1. 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
  2. 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
  3. 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 156
  4. 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
  5. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
  6. 2024Efficient LLM Scheduling by Learning to Rankcited by 83
  7. 2017Scalable Generalized Linear Bandits: Online Computation and Hashingcited by 63
  8. 2020Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 56
  9. 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
  10. 2022Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 41
  11. 2021Neural Contextual Bandits without Regretcited by 40
  12. 2019On the Performance of Thompson Sampling on Logistic Banditscited by 32
22 more
  1. 2020Improved Confidence Bounds for the Linear Logistic Model and Applications to Linear Banditscited by 31
  2. 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
  3. 2024A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Banditscited by 27
  4. 2023Improved Regret Bounds of (Multinomial) Logistic Bandits via Regret-to-Confidence-Set Conversioncited by 24
  5. 2023Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Stochastic Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 22
  6. 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivitycited by 22
  7. 2021Multinomial Logit Contextual Bandits: Provable Optimality and Practicalitycited by 21
  8. 2019Tight Regret Bounds for Infinite-armed Linear Contextual Banditscited by 17
  9. 2020Stochastic Linear Contextual Bandits with Diverse Contextscited by 16
  10. 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Updatecited by 16
  11. 2022Double Doubly Robust Thompson Sampling for Generalized Linear Contextual Banditscited by 14
  12. 2025Improved Online Confidence Bounds for Multinomial Logistic Banditscited by 14
  13. 2024Almost Free: Self-concordance in Natural Exponential Families and an Application to Banditscited by 8
  14. 2022An Experimental Design Approach for Regret Minimization in Logistic Banditscited by 7
  15. 2024Bandits with Preference Feedback: A Stackelberg Game Perspectivecited by 7
  16. 2024Queueing Matching Bandits with Preference Feedbackcited by 6
  17. 2025Single Index Bandits: Generalized Linear Contextual Bandits with Unknown Reward Functionscited by 6
  18. 2025Neural Logistic Banditscited by 5
  19. 2025Generalized Kernelized Bandits: A Novel Self-Normalized Bernstein-Like Dimension-Free Inequality and Regret Boundscited by 4
  20. 2025Enjoying Non-linearity in Multinomial Logistic Bandits: A Minimax-Optimal Algorithmcited by 3
  21. 2025Efficient Algorithms for Logistic Contextual Slate Bandits with Bandit Feedbackcited by 2
  22. 2026Queue Length Regret Bounds for Contextual Queueing Banditscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.