Logistic Bandits with tildeO(√dT) Regret without Context Diversity Assumptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the K-armed logistic bandit problem, where at each round, the agent observes K feature vectors associated with K actions. Existing approaches that achieve a rate-optimal tildeO(√dT) regret bound rely heavily on context diversity assumptions, such as strict positivity of the minimum eigenvalue of a context covariance matrix. These assumptions, however, impose strong restrictions on the context process, as they rule out the situation where the context vectors are concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. In this paper, we propose SupSplitLog, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first algorithm for logistic bandits that achieves tildeO(√dT) regret without any context diversity assumption. The key idea is to split the collected samples into two disjoint subsets when constructing estimators; one is used to compute an initial-point estimator, while the other is used to apply a Newton-type one-step correction procedure. The splitting rule is carefully designed to balance the accuracy requirements of the initial-point estimator and the one-step correction procedure. Moreover, SupSplitLog strictly improves on the existing algorithms in terms of the dependence on dimension d in the regret upper bound. Furthermore, SupSplitLog can be adapted simply to deduce a regret bound that grows with a data-dependent complexity measure, avoiding a direct dependence on d, which is favorable when the context vectors are concentrated in a low-dimensional subspace. We also provide experimental results that demonstrate numerically the superiority of our algorithm, validating the theoretical results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2026.
Builds on
34 of 48 references.
References · 34
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
- 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 156
- 2020Improved Optimistic Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 117
- 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
- 2024Efficient LLM Scheduling by Learning to Rankcited by 83
- 2017Scalable Generalized Linear Bandits: Online Computation and Hashingcited by 63
- 2020Instance-Wise Minimax-Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 56
- 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
- 2022Jointly Efficient and Optimal Algorithms for Logistic Banditscited by 41
- 2021Neural Contextual Bandits without Regretcited by 40
- 2019On the Performance of Thompson Sampling on Logistic Banditscited by 32
22 more
- 2020Improved Confidence Bounds for the Linear Logistic Model and Applications to Linear Banditscited by 31
- 2021Leveraging Good Representations in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 29
- 2024A Unified Confidence Sequence for Generalized Linear Models, with Applications to Banditscited by 27
- 2023Improved Regret Bounds of (Multinomial) Logistic Bandits via Regret-to-Confidence-Set Conversioncited by 24
- 2023Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Stochastic Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 22
- 2024Generalized Linear Bandits with Limited Adaptivitycited by 22
- 2021Multinomial Logit Contextual Bandits: Provable Optimality and Practicalitycited by 21
- 2019Tight Regret Bounds for Infinite-armed Linear Contextual Banditscited by 17
- 2020Stochastic Linear Contextual Bandits with Diverse Contextscited by 16
- 2025Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Updatecited by 16
- 2022Double Doubly Robust Thompson Sampling for Generalized Linear Contextual Banditscited by 14
- 2025Improved Online Confidence Bounds for Multinomial Logistic Banditscited by 14
- 2024Almost Free: Self-concordance in Natural Exponential Families and an Application to Banditscited by 8
- 2022An Experimental Design Approach for Regret Minimization in Logistic Banditscited by 7
- 2024Bandits with Preference Feedback: A Stackelberg Game Perspectivecited by 7
- 2024Queueing Matching Bandits with Preference Feedbackcited by 6
- 2025Single Index Bandits: Generalized Linear Contextual Bandits with Unknown Reward Functionscited by 6
- 2025Neural Logistic Banditscited by 5
- 2025Generalized Kernelized Bandits: A Novel Self-Normalized Bernstein-Like Dimension-Free Inequality and Regret Boundscited by 4
- 2025Enjoying Non-linearity in Multinomial Logistic Bandits: A Minimax-Optimal Algorithmcited by 3
- 2025Efficient Algorithms for Logistic Contextual Slate Bandits with Bandit Feedbackcited by 2
- 2026Queue Length Regret Bounds for Contextual Queueing Banditscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.