mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Poisson-GENERIC Neural Operators: Exact Metriplectic Structure in Function Space via Casimir Entropies

arXiv 2610.05570 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing thermodynamically consistent neural operators enforce GENERIC degeneracy by projecting the reversible operator, introducing state dependence without guaranteeing Jacobi. We instead use a compatible Lie--Poisson pencil L=α D+λ(uD+Du) for nonlinear transport and constant Poisson multipliers otherwise. Augmenting the observed field u with latent entropy density s makes S=int s a Casimir, so L,δ S/δ z=0 without projection. Energy combines a fixed mechanical quadratic, learned gauge-free potential, and convex internal energy. The friction operator M=AA^top enforces M,δ E/δ z=0 pointwise and supports diffusion and damping without an independent reversible transport generator. Skewness, positivity, and both degeneracies hold exactly; the continuum pencil satisfies Jacobi, verified numerically on the alias-free band. The parameterization represents the closed-form heat and damped-wave friction operators within its admissible range. Physical energy is bounded under coercivity assumptions, while a discrete-gradient integrator preserves both laws when solved to convergence. Across four PDEs in 1D and 2D and three backbones (FNO, Transolver, CNO), the model wins 61/72 seed-level comparisons against matched unconstrained baselines, recovers exact transport and wave symbols, matches heat and Burgers dissipation within 13%, and exhibits negligible advection dissipation. A constant-L ablation exposes the cost of nonlinear transport, while a learned-energy ablation shows that conserving learned energy need not constrain physical energy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  4. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  5. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 326
  6. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 214
  7. 2025Transolver++: An Accurate Neural Solver for PDEs on Million-Scale Geometriescited by 97
  8. 2020Structure-preserving neural networkscited by 55
  9. 2021Machine learning structure preserving brackets for forecasting irreversible processescited by 52
  10. 2021GFINNs: GENERIC Formalism Informed Neural Networks for Deterministic and Stochastic Dynamical Systemscited by 49
  11. 2023Group Equivariant Fourier Neural Operators for Partial Differential Equationscited by 45
  12. 2020Learning Poisson systems and trajectories of autonomous systems via Poisson neural networkscited by 38
7 more
  1. 2020OnsagerNet: Learning Stable and Interpretable Dynamics using a Generalized Onsager Principlecited by 37
  2. 2023Reversible and irreversible bracket-based dynamics for deep graph neural networkscited by 26
  3. 2023Harnessing the Power of Neural Operators with Automatically Encoded Conservation Lawscited by 24
  4. 2024Efficiently Parameterized Neural Metriplectic Systemscited by 19
  5. 2025Metriplectic Conditional Flow Matching for Dissipative Dynamicscited by 4
  6. 2026Metriplector: From Field Theory to Neural Architecturecited by 2
  7. 2026GENERIC-FNO: Embedding Energy Conservation and Entropy Production into Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.