DiVeR: Decision-Critical Verifier Learning for VLA Test-Time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning also fits: Spatial and embodied reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Scaling robot data and model capacity has improved Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies, but further progress is constrained by the high cost of robotic data. Verifier-guided test-time scaling offers an efficient alternative by sampling multiple action candidates and selecting the one most likely to lead to task success at inference time. Existing classification-based verifiers learn from trajectory-level outcomes but treat all visited states equally, even though their value for candidate discrimination can vary across a trajectory. At many states, plausible actions are similar and provide limited discrimination signal, while only a sparse set of decision-critical states admits meaningfully different actions that can substantially affect downstream outcomes. To address this, we propose DiVeR, which estimates decision criticality from the dispersion of sampled action representations. DiVeR then uses this signal to reweight verifier learning toward states where action selection is most consequential, without requiring step-level annotations or additional environment interaction. Across LIBERO, RoboCasa, and real-world experiments on a Franka Research 3 robot, DiVeR consistently improves task success through more effective verifier-guided action selection, while adding negligible verifier inference overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 52 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.
Builds on
52 of 60 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents24 Jun
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning13 Jan
- 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankings15 Oct
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
Other references · 46
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,761
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,410
- 2025GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robotscited by 1,225
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 782
34 more
- 2025SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Modelcited by 519
- 2026World Action Models are Zero-shot Policiescited by 465
- 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 303
- 2024A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AIcited by 279
- 2025MemoryVLA: Perceptual-Cognitive Memory in Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulationcited by 192
- 2025Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certaintycited by 187
- 2025VLA-RL: Towards Masterful and General Robotic Manipulation with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 176
- 2018RUDDER: Return Decomposition for Delayed Rewardscited by 173
- 2026DreamDojo: A Generalist Robot World Model from Large-Scale Human Videoscited by 135
- 2025A Careful Examination of Large Behavior Models for Multitask Dexterous Manipulationcited by 129
- 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 125
- 2025PointVLA: Injecting the 3D World into Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 105
- 2025SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 80
- 2026RoboCasa365: A Large-Scale Simulation Framework for Training and Benchmarking Generalist Robotscited by 79
- 2025RynnVLA-002: A Unified Vision-Language-Action and World Modelcited by 74
- 2025MemER: Scaling Up Memory for Robot Control via Experience Retrievalcited by 67
- 2025RoboMonkey: Scaling Test-Time Sampling and Verification for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 61
- 2026MEM: Multi-Scale Embodied Memory for Vision Language Action Modelscited by 61
- 2026Robometer: Scaling General-Purpose Robotic Reward Models via Trajectory Comparisonscited by 60
- 2024Forking Paths in Neural Text Generationcited by 34
- 2026LLM-as-a-Verifier: A General-Purpose Verification Frameworkcited by 30
- 2025Verifier-free Test-Time Sampling for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 23
- 2025Steering Vision-Language-Action Models as Anti-Exploration: A Test-Time Scaling Approachcited by 21
- 2026Scaling Verification Can Be More Effective than Scaling Policy Learning for Vision-Language-Action Alignmentcited by 21
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 20
- 2025RoVer: Robot Reward Model as Test-Time Verifier for Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 19
- 2026Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoringcited by 9
- 2026Update-Free On-Policy Steering via Verifierscited by 5
- 2026Progress Reward Modeling for Robotic Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 5
- 2025KDPE: A Kernel Density Estimation Strategy for Diffusion Policy Trajectory Selectioncited by 4
- 2026SCALE: Self-uncertainty Conditioned Adaptive Looking and Execution for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 4
- 2026Learning Process Rewards via Success Visitation Matching for Efficient RLcited by 1
- 2026Fork-Think with Confidencecited by 1
- 2026Mid-Harness: Scaling Actions Between Model and Harness for Terminal Agentscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Rethinking Visual-Language-Action Model Scaling: Alignment, Mixture, and Regularization
- 2025Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success
- 2026Flow-Support-Weighted Proposals for Test-Time Verified VLA Policies
- 2026On-the-Fly VLA Adaptation via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
- 2026VeriSpace: Spatially Grounded Action Verification for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025VLA-Adapter: An Effective Paradigm for Tiny-Scale Vision-Language-Action Model
- 2025Improving Pre-Trained Vision-Language-Action Policies with Model-Based Search
- 2026DyGRO-VLA: Cross-Task Scaling of Vision-Language-Action Models via Dynamic Grouped Residual Optimization