mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MaDeL: Manifold-Decomposed Feature Losses for Generative Modeling

arXiv 2610.04419 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models are often trained with isotropic objectives such as mean-squared error. For data concentrated near a low-dimensional manifold, however, such losses conflate displacement along the manifold, which may represent valid variation, with displacement away from it, which produces invalid samples. This mismatch is especially problematic in sparse, highly constrained domains, where ambient-space regression can encourage off-manifold interpolation. We ask whether a generative objective can distinguish manifold-parallel variation from manifold-orthogonal deviation directly from data, without explicitly estimating the manifold. We introduce a manifold-decomposed feature loss (MaDeL) that learns complementary representations from corrupted observations: one is trained to recover the clean sample, while the other is trained to recover the corruption. We show that, under a feature bottleneck, their Jacobians align with the tangent and normal spaces, exactly for linear manifolds and locally for smooth manifolds. Together, these representations define an anisotropic objective that separately measures intrinsic variation and off-manifold deviation. Across synthetic, Earth and climate science, and torsion-angle benchmarks, MaDeL improves support recovery and average angular W1 under single-step sampling; on protein backbones, it reduces steric clashes across one- and few-step sampling budgets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

24 of 38 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  3. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  4. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  5. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
  6. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  7. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
  8. 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,822
  9. 2022Equivariant Diffusion for Molecule Generation in 3Dcited by 677
  10. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 561
  11. 2023Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Modelscited by 439
  12. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
12 more
  1. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 265
  2. 2022Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modellingcited by 219
  3. 2023SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generationcited by 219
  4. 2021Projected GANs Converge Fastercited by 208
  5. 2023Manifold Preserving Guided Diffusioncited by 157
  6. 2022Riemannian Diffusion Modelscited by 122
  7. 2019Learning with minibatch Wasserstein : asymptotic and gradient propertiescited by 87
  8. 2025Improving the Euclidean Diffusion Generation of Manifold Data by Mitigating Score Function Singularitycited by 17
  9. 2023SDDM: Score-Decomposed Diffusion Models on Manifolds for Unpaired Image-to-Image Translationcited by 14
  10. 2019A gradual, semi-discrete approach to generative network training via explicit Wasserstein minimizationcited by 13
  11. 2026Riemannian MeanFlowcited by 8
  12. 2025Be Tangential to Manifold: Discovering Riemannian Metric for Diffusion Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.