mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reward-DAgger: Robot-Gated Interactive Imitation Learning with General-Purpose Progress-Based Reward Models

arXiv 2610.04054 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward hacking and misspecification also fits: Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in robot learning have enabled generalist control policies capable of completing a wide range of tasks. However, their performance degrades when deployed in unseen environments, making it critical to detect failures and teach recovery behaviors. Existing runtime monitoring methods often require task- and policy-specific training or hyperparameter tuning, limiting cross-task deployment and introducing additional overhead during iterative policy updates. We present Reward-DAgger, a robot-gated interactive imitation learning framework that uses dense progress signals from a general-purpose reward model to determine when human intervention is needed. Our approach is agnostic to the underlying policy architecture, requires no access to policy internals, and can be applied across tasks without retuning the gating mechanism. Our results show that Reward-DAgger achieves a better failure-detection accuracy-latency tradeoff than existing runtime monitoring baselines. Across eight simulated and real-world tasks, Reward-DAgger consistently improves the downstream policy's autonomous success rate throughout interactive learning and achieves strong return on human effort, outperforming the baselines in most settings. Importantly, the same gating configuration is used across tasks without task-specific hyperparameter tuning, demonstrating transfer across tasks, environments, and policy architectures. Code and videos are available at https://liralab.usc.edu/reward-dagger.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward hacking and misspecification, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Large Reward Models: Generalizable Online Robot Reward Generation with Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025RoboScape-R: Unified Reward-Observation World Models for Generalizable Robotics Training via RL
  3. 2023Model-Based Runtime Monitoring with Interactive Imitation Learning
  4. 2026Robometer: Scaling General-Purpose Robotic Reward Models via Trajectory Comparisons
  5. 2023RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Progress Reward Modeling for Robotic Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
  7. 2026PHIRL: Aligning Learned Rewards with Task Progress for Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026RARM: Confidence-Gated Progress Reward Modeling for RL in Manipulation