Autonomous Robotic Navigation for Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface Access
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Endovascular brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) avoid craniotomy but require precise device delivery through anatomically variable cerebral veins. This work presents the first demonstration of in vitro autonomous robotic navigation for endovascular BCI access in the cerebral venous system. Soft Actor-Critic controllers were trained in silico for two sequential tasks spanning the right internal jugular vein to the superior sagittal sinus, using geometric augmentation of one training anatomy. Navigation was evaluated in a training anatomy and an anatomically unseen hold-out model over 250 in silico episodes and five fluoroscopy-guided in vitro robotic runs per task-anatomy condition, comprising 1,000 simulated episodes and 20 physical runs overall. Task recurrent predictors were also evaluated for online identification of impending navigation failure. In silico success rates for Tasks A and B were 85.6% and 98.4% in the training anatomy and 42.0% and 91.6% in the hold-out anatomy, respectively. Fourteen of 20 physical runs were successful (70% overall), including 80% success for Task B in the hold-out phantom. In silico the predictors detected 99.3-100.0% of failures with false-alarm rates of 0.8-6.7%. During in vitro evaluation, predicted risk increased before failed episodes, but elevated probabilities during some successful runs showed reduced calibration after transfer. These results demonstrate the feasibility of autonomous cerebral venous access and show how online failure prediction could support human oversight, while also identifying anatomical generalization and sim-to-real calibration as priorities before preclinical translation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
9 of 31 references.
References · 9
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2024Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Reviewcited by 7
- 2024Learning-Based Autonomous Navigation, Benchmark Environments and Simulation Framework for Endovascular Interventionscited by 6
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Two Device Navigation of Cerebral Vessels in Mechanical Thrombectomycited by 6
- 2025World Model for AI Autonomous Navigation in Mechanical Thrombectomycited by 5
- 2026Toward Safe Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Interventions using World Modelscited by 2
- 2025Toward Autonomous Soft Robotic Endovascular Navigation via Imitation Learningcited by 1
- 2026Toward AI Autonomous Navigation for Mechanical Thrombectomy using Hierarchical Modular Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (HM-MARL)cited by 1
- 2026A Position Statement on Endovascular Models and Effectiveness Metrics for Mechanical Thrombectomy Navigation, on behalf of the Stakeholder Taskforce for AI-assisted Robotic Thrombectomy (START)cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Advancing Embodied Intelligence in Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of AI Solutions
- 2025Towards Autonomous Navigation in Endovascular Interventions ↗
- 2024Autonomous Guidewire Navigation for Robot-assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Knowledge-Driven Visual Guidance Approach
- 2026Sample-Efficient Learning with Online Expert Correction for Autonomous Catheter Steering in Endovascular Bifurcation Navigation
- 2026Learning Expert Strategy for Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Intervention via Decoupled Procedural Execution ↗
- 2024Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning
- 2024A Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Strategy for Autonomous Guidewire Navigation
- 2026Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation ↗