Toward AI Autonomous Navigation for Mechanical Thrombectomy using Hierarchical Modular Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (HM-MARL)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is typically the optimal treatment for acute ischemic stroke involving large vessel occlusions, but access is limited due to geographic and logistical barriers. Reinforcement learning (RL) shows promise in autonomous endovascular navigation, but generalization across 'long' navigation tasks remains challenging. We propose a Hierarchical Modular Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (HM-MARL) framework for autonomous two-device navigation in vitro, enabling efficient and generalizable navigation. HM-MARL was developed to autonomously navigate a guide catheter and guidewire from the femoral artery to the internal carotid artery (ICA). A modular multi-agent approach was used to decompose the complex navigation task into specialized subtasks, each trained using Soft Actor-Critic RL. The framework was validated in both in silico and in vitro testbeds to assess generalization and real-world feasibility. In silico, a single-vasculature model achieved 92-100% success rates on individual anatomies, while a multi-vasculature model achieved 56-80% across multiple patient anatomies. In vitro, both HM-MARL models successfully navigated 100% of trials from the femoral artery to the right common carotid artery and 80% to the right ICA but failed on the left-side vessel superhuman challenge due to the anatomy and catheter type used in navigation. This study presents the first demonstration of in vitro autonomous navigation in MT vasculature. While HM-MARL enables generalization across anatomies, the simulation-to-real transition introduces challenges. Future work will refine RL strategies using world models and validate performance on unseen in vitro data, advancing autonomous MT towards clinical translation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2026.
Builds on
11 of 38 references.
References · 11
- 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 761
- 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
- 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 482
- 2021Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learning: Challenges and Directionscited by 42
- 2024Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learningcited by 7
- 2024Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Reviewcited by 6
- 2024Learning-Based Autonomous Navigation, Benchmark Environments and Simulation Framework for Endovascular Interventionscited by 5
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Two Device Navigation of Cerebral Vessels in Mechanical Thrombectomycited by 5
- 2025World Model for AI Autonomous Navigation in Mechanical Thrombectomycited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Toward Safe Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Interventions using World Models
- 2026Progressive Experience Fusion for Multi-Task World Model Control in Endovascular Navigation
- 2025Toward Autonomous Soft Robotic Endovascular Navigation via Imitation Learning
- 2025Advancing Embodied Intelligence in Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of AI Solutions
- 2026Vision-Language Procedural Reasoning for Context-Aware Reward Modeling of Robotic Endovascular Guidewire Navigation
- 2021Deep reinforcement learning for guidewire navigation in coronary artery phantom
- 2023CASOG: Conservative Actor-critic with SmOoth Gradient for Skill Learning in Robot-Assisted Intervention
- 2024From Decision to Action in Surgical Autonomy: Multi-Modal Large Language Models for Robot-Assisted Blood Suction