mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning

arXiv 2406.12499 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 7

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for clinical treatment and surgery

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires can enhance endovascular surgery safety and efficacy, reducing procedure times and operator radiation exposure. Integrating tele-operated robotics could widen access to time-sensitive emergency procedures like mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Reinforcement learning (RL) shows potential in endovascular navigation, yet its application encounters challenges without a reward signal. This study explores the viability of autonomous navigation in MT vasculature using inverse RL (IRL) to leverage expert demonstrations. Methods: This study established a simulation-based training and evaluation environment for MT navigation. We used IRL to infer reward functions from expert behaviour when navigating a guidewire and catheter. We utilized soft actor-critic to train models with various reward functions and compared their performance in silico. Results: We demonstrated feasibility of navigation using IRL. When evaluating single versus dual device (i.e. guidewire versus catheter and guidewire) tracking, both methods achieved high success rates of 95% and 96%, respectively. Dual-tracking, however, utilized both devices mimicking an expert. A success rate of 100% and procedure time of 22.6 s were obtained when training with a reward function obtained through reward shaping. This outperformed a dense reward function (96%, 24.9 s) and an IRL-derived reward function (48%, 59.2 s). Conclusions: We have contributed to the advancement of autonomous endovascular intervention navigation, particularly MT, by employing IRL. The results underscore the potential of using reward shaping to train models, offering a promising avenue for enhancing the accessibility and precision of MT. We envisage that future research can extend our methodology to diverse anatomical structures to enhance generalizability.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for clinical treatment and surgery, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 3 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

3 of 40 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  2. 2021Deep reinforcement learning for guidewire navigation in coronary artery phantomcited by 10
  3. 2024Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Reviewcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025World Model for AI Autonomous Navigation in Mechanical Thrombectomy
  2. 2026Sample-Efficient Learning with Online Expert Correction for Autonomous Catheter Steering in Endovascular Bifurcation Navigation
  3. 2026Toward Safe Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Interventions using World Models
  4. 2024A Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Strategy for Autonomous Guidewire Navigation
  5. 2025Toward Autonomous Soft Robotic Endovascular Navigation via Imitation Learning
  6. 2024Autonomous Guidewire Navigation for Robot-assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Knowledge-Driven Visual Guidance Approach
  7. 2026Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation ↗
  8. 2026Learning Expert Strategy for Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Intervention via Decoupled Procedural Execution ↗