Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires in mechanical thrombectomy using inverse reinforcement learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for clinical treatment and surgery
Abstract (arXiv)
Purpose: Autonomous navigation of catheters and guidewires can enhance endovascular surgery safety and efficacy, reducing procedure times and operator radiation exposure. Integrating tele-operated robotics could widen access to time-sensitive emergency procedures like mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Reinforcement learning (RL) shows potential in endovascular navigation, yet its application encounters challenges without a reward signal. This study explores the viability of autonomous navigation in MT vasculature using inverse RL (IRL) to leverage expert demonstrations. Methods: This study established a simulation-based training and evaluation environment for MT navigation. We used IRL to infer reward functions from expert behaviour when navigating a guidewire and catheter. We utilized soft actor-critic to train models with various reward functions and compared their performance in silico. Results: We demonstrated feasibility of navigation using IRL. When evaluating single versus dual device (i.e. guidewire versus catheter and guidewire) tracking, both methods achieved high success rates of 95% and 96%, respectively. Dual-tracking, however, utilized both devices mimicking an expert. A success rate of 100% and procedure time of 22.6 s were obtained when training with a reward function obtained through reward shaping. This outperformed a dense reward function (96%, 24.9 s) and an IRL-derived reward function (48%, 59.2 s). Conclusions: We have contributed to the advancement of autonomous endovascular intervention navigation, particularly MT, by employing IRL. The results underscore the potential of using reward shaping to train models, offering a promising avenue for enhancing the accessibility and precision of MT. We envisage that future research can extend our methodology to diverse anatomical structures to enhance generalizability.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for clinical treatment and surgery, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 3 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.
Builds on
3 of 40 references.
References · 3
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2021Deep reinforcement learning for guidewire navigation in coronary artery phantomcited by 10
- 2024Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Reviewcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Two Device Navigation of Cerebral Vessels in Mechanical Thrombectomycited by 6
- 2025Advancing Embodied Intelligence in Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of AI Solutionscited by 2
- 2026Towards Next-Generation Healthcare: A Survey of Medical Embodied AI for Perception, Decision-Making, and Actioncited by 2
- 2025DARIL: When Imitation Learning outperforms Reinforcement Learning in Surgical Action Planningcited by 1
- 2026Toward AI Autonomous Navigation for Mechanical Thrombectomy using Hierarchical Modular Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (HM-MARL)cited by 1
- 2026Towards Real-Time Autonomous Navigation: Transformer-Based Catheter Tip Tracking in Fluoroscopycited by 1
- 2025DINO-CVA: A Multimodal Goal-Conditioned Vision-to-Action Model for Autonomous Catheter Navigationcited by 0
- 2026Towards Real-Time Autonomous Navigation: Transformer-Based Catheter Tip Tracking in Fluoroscopy14 May 2026
- 2026Towards Next-Generation Healthcare: A Survey of Medical Embodied AI for Perception, Decision-Making, and Action5 Apr 2026
- 2026Toward AI Autonomous Navigation for Mechanical Thrombectomy using Hierarchical Modular Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (HM-MARL)20 Feb 2026
- 2025DINO-CVA: A Multimodal Goal-Conditioned Vision-to-Action Model for Autonomous Catheter Navigation19 Oct 2025
- 2025DARIL: When Imitation Learning outperforms Reinforcement Learning in Surgical Action Planning7 Jul 2025
- 2025Advancing Embodied Intelligence in Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of AI Solutions21 Apr 2025
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Safe Autonomous Two Device Navigation of Cerebral Vessels in Mechanical Thrombectomy31 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025World Model for AI Autonomous Navigation in Mechanical Thrombectomy
- 2026Sample-Efficient Learning with Online Expert Correction for Autonomous Catheter Steering in Endovascular Bifurcation Navigation
- 2026Toward Safe Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Interventions using World Models
- 2024A Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Strategy for Autonomous Guidewire Navigation
- 2025Toward Autonomous Soft Robotic Endovascular Navigation via Imitation Learning
- 2024Autonomous Guidewire Navigation for Robot-assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Knowledge-Driven Visual Guidance Approach
- 2026Vascular Geometry Characterization for AI-Based Endovascular Navigation ↗
- 2026Learning Expert Strategy for Autonomous Robotic Endovascular Intervention via Decoupled Procedural Execution ↗