HASTE: Evolving Agent Harnesses Against Emerging Attacks Using Sparse Evidence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Agent harnesses play a critical role in defenses by enforcing safety constraints to prevent unsafe actions. However, rapidly emerging attacks outpace manual harness adaptation, motivating automated harness evolution. Yet the signals available for harness evolution are often sparse, such as brief descriptions or a few attack examples in threat reports and preprints. To address this limitation, we introduce HASTE, a multi-agent framework that evolves agent harnesses from sparse threat evidence through an adversarial interplay between safety-specification generation and attack-case generation. Safety specifications guide harness updates toward addressing identified safety vulnerabilities, while attack cases probe for remaining safety vulnerabilities after each update. By feeding evaluation outcomes back into both processes, HASTE enables harness evolution against emerging attacks beyond the initially observed evidence. Experimental results across multiple backbone models, attack types, and evidence forms show that HASTE consistently reduces attack success rates while preserving benign-task utility. The code is available at https://github.com/xxiqiao/HASTE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
45 of 56 references.
References · 45
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
- 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
- 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agentscited by 538
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
- 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 432
33 more
- 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Basescited by 429
- 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 407
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 401
- 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 309
- 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agentscited by 306
- 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Designcited by 297
- 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 223
- 2025Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agentscited by 158
- 2024AgentSquare: Automatic LLM Agent Search in Modular Design Spacecited by 155
- 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 155
- 2025ShieldAgent: Shielding Agents via Verifiable Safety Policy Reasoningcited by 151
- 2025LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agentscited by 127
- 2024AutoFlow: Automated Workflow Generation for Large Language Model Agentscited by 83
- 2026AutoHarness: improving LLM agents by automatically synthesizing a code harnesscited by 76
- 2025MemoryGraft: Persistent Compromise of LLM Agents via Poisoned Experience Retrievalcited by 72
- 2026ToolSafe: Enhancing Tool Invocation Safety of LLM-based agents via Proactive Step-level Guardrail and Feedbackcited by 72
- 2025SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agentscited by 71
- 2026Natural-Language Agent Harnessescited by 61
- 2026Harness-Bench: Measuring Harness Effects across Models in Realistic Agent Workflowscited by 57
- 2026AgentDoG: A Diagnostic Guardrail Framework for AI Agent Safety and Securitycited by 50
- 2024From Allies to Adversaries: Manipulating LLM Tool-Calling through Adversarial Injectioncited by 38
- 2025Building a Foundational Guardrail for General Agentic Systems via Synthetic Datacited by 29
- 2025AgentAlign: Navigating Safety Alignment in the Shift from Informative to Agentic Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2025Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignmentcited by 18
- 2025Lifelong Safety Alignment for Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025AlphaAlign: Incentivizing Safety Alignment with Extremely Simplified Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2026SafeHarness: Lifecycle-Integrated Security Architecture for LLM-based Agent Deploymentcited by 15
- 2025TROJail: Trajectory-Level Optimization for Multi-Turn Large Language Model Jailbreaks with Process Rewardscited by 14
- 2026SWE-Bench Mobile: Can Large Language Model Agents Develop Industry-Level Mobile Applications?cited by 12
- 2026StepGuard: Learning Step-Level Guardrails with Scalable Supervision and Safety-Utility Balancingcited by 6
- 2026Herculean: An Agentic Benchmark for Financial Intelligencecited by 4
- 2026Plant, Persist, Trigger: Sleeper Attack on Large Language Model Agentscited by 3
- 2026FinHarness: An Inline Lifecycle Safety Harness for Finance LLM Agentscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.