mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Universal Byte-Level Encoding: UTF-8/UTF-16 Routing to Reduce Cross-Script Token-Budget Disparities

arXiv 2610.01984 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Byte-level byte-pair encoding (BBPE) tokenizers are attractive for multilingual large language models (LLMs) because they cover all Unicode text. In UTF-8-based BBPE, however, many scripts start from a higher fallback cost than English: when no learned merges can be applied, a multibyte character requires multiple byte-derived symbols. We call this worst-case pre-merge cost the encoding floor. A higher floor can increase token counts and per-request cost and shrink usable context. Changing the text encoding can reduce this gap, but a single global encoding can make already-efficient English spans more expensive in mixed-script text. We propose Universal Byte-Level Encoding (UBE), a dual-alphabet tokenizer that keeps 1-2-byte UTF-8 characters on the UTF-8 path while routing 3-4-byte UTF-8 characters through UTF-16. This lowers the encoding floor for 3-byte Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP) characters in scripts with high token premiums (token counts relative to English) without raising it for already-efficient spans in mixed-script text. UBE changes only the byte representation presented to byte-pair encoding (BPE); the merge rule remains standard, and exact decoding is preserved. UBE also composes with alternative boundary policies and morphology-based representations. In a Unicode 17 audit, UBE exactly round-trips all Unicode scalar values and all inputs in the official normalization, grapheme-break, and emoji test suites. Across intrinsic evaluations, UBE lowers dispersion in English-normalized token-count ratios, reducing cross-lingual token-budget disparity. In multilingual language model (LM) experiments, UBE matches BBPE's LM quality. In the main multilingual settings, UBE reduces token counts most for high-premium scripts and slightly lowers English token counts, yielding more usable context under fixed token budgets and faster prompt processing in content-matched benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 86 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  4. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  5. 2019Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Needcited by 717
  6. 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 618
  7. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  8. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation in the Wild: Findings and Challengescited by 257
  9. 2024Stable LM 2 1.6B Technical Reportcited by 90
  10. 2025One Tokenizer To Rule Them All: Emergent Language Plasticity via Multilingual Tokenizerscited by 12
  11. 2026The Roots of Performance Disparity in Multilingual Language Models: Intrinsic Modeling Difficulty or Design Choices?cited by 11
  12. 2025Bolmo: Byteifying the Next Generation of Language Modelscited by 9
5 more
  1. 2025The Art of Breaking Words: Rethinking Multilingual Tokenizer Designcited by 6
  2. 2026The Script Tax: Measuring Tokenization-Driven Efficiency and Latency Disparities in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 4
  3. 2025Bit-level BPE: Below the byte boundarycited by 3
  4. 2026Reducing Tokenization Premiums for Low-Resource Languagescited by 3
  5. 2026Separate Before You Compress: The WWHO Tokenization Architecturecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.