Bit-level BPE: Below the byte boundary
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Byte-level fallbacks for subword tokenization have become a common practice in large language models. In particular, it has been demonstrated to be incredibly effective as a pragmatic solution for preventing OOV, especially in the context of larger models. However, breaking a character down to individual bytes significantly increases the sequence length for long-tail tokens in languages such as Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK) and other character-diverse contexts such as emoji. The increased sequence length results in longer computation during both training and inference. In this work, we propose a simple compression technique that reduces the sequence length losslessly.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.
Builds on
15 of 23 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 504
- 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 313
- 2023Language Model Tokenizers Introduce Unfairness Between Languagescited by 207
- 2018Marian: Fast Neural Machine Translation in C++cited by 202
- 2023Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Modelscited by 186
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 130
- 2019Neural Machine Translation with Byte-Level Subwordscited by 115
- 2020CharacterBERT: Reconciling ELMo and BERT for Word-Level Open-Vocabulary Representations From Characterscited by 87
- 2024Unpacking Tokenization: Evaluating Text Compression and its Correlation with Model Performancecited by 61
3 more
- 2023Tokenization and the Noiseless Channelcited by 58
- 2017Which Encoding is the Best for Text Classification in Chinese, English, Japanese and Korean?cited by 10
- 2020Neural Machine Translation without Embeddingscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.