Parameter-Efficient Distributionally Robust Adaptation of Tabular Foundation Models under Subpopulation Shift
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite strong mean accuracy, tabular foundation models (TFMs) can perform poorly on underrepresented groups under subpopulation shift, where group proportions change between training and deployment. We propose DR-TFM, a parameter-efficient distributionally robust adaptation framework that requires no true group annotations. DR-TFM adjusts attention to labeled context examples by fine-tuning an existing query scaling network or adding and training one, while keeping all other parameters fixed. We instantiate the framework with two robust objectives using estimated groups or source conditional distributions derived from training data. For TabPFN-3, adaptation updates only 0.016% of the pretrained model's parameters. Across five tabular benchmarks, DR-TFM achieves substantially higher average worst-group accuracy than pretrained TFMs and the compared robust baselines without true group annotations, while maintaining competitive mean group accuracy. DR-TFM also improves average worst-group accuracy on ACS Income and across four additional TFMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
31 of 41 references.
References · 31
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
- 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 267
- 2020No Subclass Left Behind: Fine-Grained Robustness in Coarse-Grained Classification Problemscited by 208
- 2016Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approachcited by 182
- 2020Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 179
19 more
- 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
- 2024TabDPT: Scaling Tabular Foundation Models on Real Datacited by 97
- 2020Relative Flatness and Generalizationcited by 88
- 2019Stable Learning via Sample Reweightingcited by 70
- 2024Retrieval & Fine-Tuning for In-Context Tabular Modelscited by 58
- 2024TuneTables: Context Optimization for Scalable Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 47
- 2021Unsupervised Learning of Debiased Representations with Pseudo-Attributescited by 44
- 2023Identifying Spurious Biases Early in Training through the Lens of Simplicity Biascited by 44
- 2025A Closer Look at TabPFN v2: Understanding Its Strengths and Extending Its Capabilitiescited by 38
- 2025Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 36
- 2025TabPFN Unleashed: A Scalable and Effective Solution to Tabular Classification Problemscited by 33
- 2024Mixture of In-Context Prompters for Tabular PFNscited by 32
- 2024Towards Robust Out-of-Distribution Generalization Bounds via Sharpnesscited by 10
- 2025FairPFN: A Tabular Foundation Model for Causal Fairnesscited by 9
- 2025Towards Fair In-Context Learning with Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 8
- 2025Mitigating Spurious Correlation via Distributionally Robust Learning with Hierarchical Ambiguity Setscited by 7
- 2026EXAONE Tabular 1.0 : Technical Reportcited by 7
- 2026Distributionally Robust Classification for Multi-source Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 3
- 2026Mitigating Label Shift in Tabular In-Context Learning via Test-Time Posterior Adjustmentcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.