mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

JoinGR: Learning to Traverse Join Graphs for Table Retrieval

arXiv 2610.01064 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieving the right tables is a prerequisite for Text-to-SQL over realistic databases. Dense table retrievers rank schema elements independently, but this ignores a key source of evidence: some required tables are not mentioned in the question and become identifiable only through their join relationships to already relevant tables. We introduce JOINGR, a join-aware table retrieval method that treats the database join graph as the retrieval space. Columns are represented as graph nodes, while intra-table and foreign-key relationships are represented as typed edges. Given a question, JOINGR selects semantically similar anchor tables, traverses join edges with a query-conditioned scorer, and aggregates the resulting edge deposits into table scores. The scorer is a lightweight MLP on top of frozen query, node, and edge embeddings, trained with a pairwise margin loss over gold tables. On BIRD and Spider datasets, JOINGR is competitive with the strongest retrieval baselines. On BEAVER, a challenging enterprise benchmark with multi-hop table requirements, JOINGR substantially improves recall over dense retrieval and re-ranking baselines. Cross-domain experiments show that the learned scorer transfers across benchmarks, indicating that the method captures reusable joingraph traversal behavior.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

18 of 22 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
  3. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
  4. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  5. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 667
  6. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 556
  7. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  8. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 420
  9. 2019Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representationcited by 210
  10. 2021Open Domain Question Answering over Tables via Dense Retrievalcited by 74
  11. 2024The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Modelscited by 67
  12. 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 37
6 more
  1. 2024Is Table Retrieval a Solved Problem? Exploring Join-Aware Multi-Table Retrievalcited by 27
  2. 2025Plugging Schema Graph into Multi-Table QA: A Human-Guided Framework for Reducing LLM Reliancecited by 7
  3. 2025SchemaGraphSQL: Efficient Schema Linking with Pathfinding Graph Algorithms for Text-to-SQL on Large-Scale Databasescited by 3
  4. 2025REaR: Retrieve, Expand and Refine for Effective Multitable Retrievalcited by 3
  5. 2025Exploring Multi-Table Retrieval Through Iterative Searchcited by 2
  6. 2026CORE-T: COherent REtrieval of Tables for Text-to-SQLcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.