mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MOMAT: Mixture of Multiple Atlases for Low-Power Jailbreak Defense of Quantized LLMs

arXiv 2610.01058 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking also fits: Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantized large language models are increasingly deployed on edge devices for their low latency and energy efficiency. However, model quantization weakens alignment safeguards, leaving qLLMs (quantized large language models) highly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. To address this challenge, we present MOMAT (Mixture of Multiple Atlases), a hardware-enhanced safety framework that combines structured knowledge retrieval with low-power defense acceleration. Each atlas represents a semantic cluster of harmful or benign sample sets and policy templates, enabling domain-localized Retrieval-Augmented Generation guarding that mitigates the curse of dimensionality and the resulting semantic sparsity problem in large, heterogeneous safety databases. MOMAT retrieves top-k similarity features from all atlases for each prompt and evaluates them using a lightweight MoE (Mixture of Experts) detector, while a CiM (Compute-in-Memory)-accelerated similarity engine performs fast, low-power atlas-local retrieval. MOMAT's CiM-based retrieval accelerates a 100-query batch from 15,052.44 ms to 3,207.21 ns (a 4.69 × 106× speedup) and reduces energy from 8.1 × 107 μJ to 3.32 μJ, yielding an approximately 2.5 × 105× energy reduction over DRAM-based (Raspberry Pi) baselines. Red-team evaluations across standard benchmarks show that MOMAT matches the defense performance of state-of-the-art methods while avoiding benign overkill and providing substantial efficiency gains, demonstrating that CiM-based modular defenses can make edge-deployed qLLMs both safer and more energy-efficient. We will release the full 223.2k-sample dataset to foster future research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

27 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Beyond the Tip of Efficiency: Uncovering the Submerged Threats of Jailbreak Attacks in Small Language Models27 Feb
  2. 2024RePD: Defending Jailbreak Attack through a Retrieval-based Prompt Decomposition Process11 Oct
  3. 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing28 May
  4. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack2 Apr
  5. 2024EasyJailbreak: A Unified Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models18 Mar
  6. 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllability13 Feb
  7. 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreaker6 Nov
  8. 2023Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation10 Oct
  9. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 18

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,234
  3. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  4. 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modificationscited by 220
  5. 2024Exploiting LLM Quantizationcited by 61
  6. 2024Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?cited by 56
  7. 2024Decoding Compressed Trust: Scrutinizing the Trustworthiness of Efficient LLMs Under Compressioncited by 54
  8. 2023ZeroQuant-FP: A Leap Forward in LLMs Post-Training W4A8 Quantization Using Floating-Point Formatscited by 44
  9. 2024Beyond Perplexity: Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation of LLM Compressioncited by 32
  10. 2025Investigating the Impact of Quantization Methods on the Safety and Reliability of Large Language Modelscited by 17
  11. 2024Robust Implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Edge-based Computing-in-Memory Architecturescited by 12
  12. 2024Investigating the Impact of Quantization on Adversarial Robustnesscited by 9
6 more
  1. 2025Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defensecited by 7
  2. 2025RAGuard: A Novel Approach for in-context Safe Retrieval Augmented Generation for LLMscited by 5
  3. 2026Tone Matters: The Impact of Linguistic Tone on Hallucination in VLMscited by 4
  4. 2026LLM-as-Judge Framework for Evaluating Tone-Induced Hallucination in Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
  5. 2025Cosmos: A CXL-Based Full In-Memory System for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Searchcited by 2
  6. 2023WWW: What, When, Where to Compute-in-Memorycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026LASA: Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment at the Semantic Bottleneck for LLM Safety
  2. 2025EASE: Practical and Efficient Safety Alignment for Small Language Models
  3. 2025On Jailbreaking Quantized Language Models Through Fault Injection Attacks
  4. 2025QueryAttack: Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models Using Structured Non-natural Query Language
  5. 2025GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMs
  6. 2025Scalable Defense against In-the-wild Jailbreaking Attacks with Safety Context Retrieval
  7. 2026Provable Defense Framework for LLM Jailbreaks via Noise-Augumented Alignment
  8. 2025Decoding One Safety Trigger Token for Balancing Safety and Usability in Large Language Models