GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMs
On the map: LLM safety and security → Mixture-of-experts routing safety
Abstract (arXiv)
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have advanced the scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) by activating only a sparse subset of parameters per input, enabling state-of-the-art performance with reduced computational cost. As these models are increasingly deployed in critical domains, understanding and strengthening their alignment mechanisms is essential to prevent harmful outputs. However, existing LLM safety research has focused almost exclusively on dense architectures, leaving the unique safety properties of MoEs largely unexamined. The modular, sparsely-activated design of MoEs suggests that safety mechanisms may operate differently than in dense models, raising questions about their robustness. In this paper, we present GateBreaker, the first training-free, lightweight, and architecture-agnostic attack framework that compromises the safety alignment of modern MoE LLMs at inference time. GateBreaker operates in three stages: (i) gate-level profiling, which identifies safety experts disproportionately routed on harmful inputs, (ii) expert-level localization, which localizes the safety structure within safety experts, and (iii) targeted safety removal, which disables the identified safety structure to compromise the safety alignment. Our study shows that MoE safety concentrates within a small subset of neurons coordinated by sparse routing. Selective disabling of these neurons, approximately 3% of neurons in the targeted expert layers, significantly increases the averaged attack success rate (ASR) from 7.4% to 64.9% against the eight latest aligned MoE LLMs with limited utility degradation. These safety neurons transfer across models within the same family, raising ASR from 17.9% to 67.7% with one-shot transfer attack. Furthermore, GateBreaker generalizes to five MoE vision language models (VLMs) with 60.9% ASR on unsafe image inputs.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mixture-of-experts routing safety, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 49 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2025.
Builds on
49 of 66 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025SAFEx: Analyzing Vulnerabilities of MoE-Based LLMs via Stable Safety-critical Expert Identification20 Jun
- 2025BadMoE: Backdooring Mixture-of-Experts LLMs via Optimizing Routing Triggers and Infecting Dormant Experts24 Apr
Other references · 47
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
35 more
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 867
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
- 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 572
- 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 560
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 489
- 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Promptscited by 398
- 2025Kimi-VL Technical Reportcited by 388
- 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 385
- 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 336
- 2024A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Modelscited by 237
- 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modificationscited by 231
- 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attackscited by 230
- 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 228
- 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 223
- 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 155
- 2024Safety Layers in Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Securitycited by 134
- 2024Language Models are Homer Simpson! Safety Re-Alignment of Fine-tuned Language Models through Task Arithmeticcited by 112
- 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 95
- 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 94
- 2023Prompt Packer: Deceiving LLMs through Compositional Instruction with Hidden Attackscited by 35
- 2025NeuroStrike: Neuron-Level Attacks on Aligned LLMscited by 22
- 2025TwinBreak: Jailbreaking LLM Security Alignments based on Twin Promptscited by 19
- 2025Pangu Pro MoE: Mixture of Grouped Experts for Efficient Sparsitycited by 18
- 2024Buffer Overflow in Mixture of Expertscited by 13
- 2024Stealing User Prompts from Mixture of Expertscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.
11 papers.
- 2026RouteHijack: Routing-Aware Attack on Mixture-of-Experts LLMscited by 6
- 2026Large Language Lobotomy: Jailbreaking Mixture-of-Experts via Expert Silencingcited by 4
- 2026RASA: Routing-Aware Safety Alignment for Mixture-of-Experts Modelscited by 3
- 2026Misrouter: Exploiting Routing Mechanisms for Input-Only Attacks on Mixture-of-Experts LLMscited by 3
- 2026NeST: Neuron Selective Tuning for LLM Safetycited by 2
- 2026You Snooze, You Lose: Automatic Safety Alignment Restoration through Neural Weight Translationcited by 0
- 2026Policy-Masked Private Experts: Auditable and Reversible Capability Access Control in Sparse MoE Modelscited by 0
- 2026NeuronFuzz: Safety Neuron Guided Fuzzing for LLM Safety Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026WoE Wrote It? Watermarking Mixture-of-Experts LLMs for Black-Box Text Provenancecited by 0
- 2026BadEngram: Backdoor Attack on Gated Memory Components in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Frequency Is Not Sensitivity Identifying Safety-Sensitive Experts in Sparse MoE LLMcited by 0
- 2026Frequency Is Not Sensitivity Identifying Safety-Sensitive Experts in Sparse MoE LLM2 Oct 2026
- 2026BadEngram: Backdoor Attack on Gated Memory Components in LLMs11 Sep 2026
- 2026WoE Wrote It? Watermarking Mixture-of-Experts LLMs for Black-Box Text Provenance29 Aug 2026
- 2026NeuronFuzz: Safety Neuron Guided Fuzzing for LLM Safety Evaluation26 Aug 2026
- 2026Policy-Masked Private Experts: Auditable and Reversible Capability Access Control in Sparse MoE Models7 Aug 2026
- 2026You Snooze, You Lose: Automatic Safety Alignment Restoration through Neural Weight Translation6 May 2026
- 2026Misrouter: Exploiting Routing Mechanisms for Input-Only Attacks on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs6 May 2026
- 2026RouteHijack: Routing-Aware Attack on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs1 May 2026
- 2026NeST: Neuron Selective Tuning for LLM Safety18 Feb 2026
- 2026Large Language Lobotomy: Jailbreaking Mixture-of-Experts via Expert Silencing9 Feb 2026
- 2026RASA: Routing-Aware Safety Alignment for Mixture-of-Experts Models4 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Defending MoE LLMs against Harmful Fine-Tuning via Safety Routing Alignment
- 2026Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
- 2026SEAL: Reinforcing Global Safety in Mixture-of-Experts through Shared Expert ALignment
- 2026MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized Expertise
- 2025Exploiting the Experts: Unauthorized Compression in MoE-LLMs
- 2024SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models
- 2025Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defense
- 2026Understanding and Preserving Safety in Fine-Tuned LLMs