mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMs

arXiv 2512.21008 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2025cs.CRcited by 11

On the map: LLM safety and security → Mixture-of-experts routing safety

Abstract (arXiv)

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have advanced the scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) by activating only a sparse subset of parameters per input, enabling state-of-the-art performance with reduced computational cost. As these models are increasingly deployed in critical domains, understanding and strengthening their alignment mechanisms is essential to prevent harmful outputs. However, existing LLM safety research has focused almost exclusively on dense architectures, leaving the unique safety properties of MoEs largely unexamined. The modular, sparsely-activated design of MoEs suggests that safety mechanisms may operate differently than in dense models, raising questions about their robustness. In this paper, we present GateBreaker, the first training-free, lightweight, and architecture-agnostic attack framework that compromises the safety alignment of modern MoE LLMs at inference time. GateBreaker operates in three stages: (i) gate-level profiling, which identifies safety experts disproportionately routed on harmful inputs, (ii) expert-level localization, which localizes the safety structure within safety experts, and (iii) targeted safety removal, which disables the identified safety structure to compromise the safety alignment. Our study shows that MoE safety concentrates within a small subset of neurons coordinated by sparse routing. Selective disabling of these neurons, approximately 3% of neurons in the targeted expert layers, significantly increases the averaged attack success rate (ASR) from 7.4% to 64.9% against the eight latest aligned MoE LLMs with limited utility degradation. These safety neurons transfer across models within the same family, raising ASR from 17.9% to 67.7% with one-shot transfer attack. Furthermore, GateBreaker generalizes to five MoE vision language models (VLMs) with 60.9% ASR on unsafe image inputs.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mixture-of-experts routing safety, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 49 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2025.

Builds on

49 of 66 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SAFEx: Analyzing Vulnerabilities of MoE-Based LLMs via Stable Safety-critical Expert Identification20 Jun
  2. 2025BadMoE: Backdooring Mixture-of-Experts LLMs via Optimizing Routing Triggers and Infecting Dormant Experts24 Apr

Other references · 47

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  8. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  10. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  11. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  12. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
35 more
  1. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  2. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  3. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  4. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  5. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  6. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  7. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  8. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  10. 2024DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 867
  11. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
  12. 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 572
  13. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 560
  14. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
  15. 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 489
  16. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Promptscited by 398
  17. 2025Kimi-VL Technical Reportcited by 388
  18. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 385
  19. 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 336
  20. 2024A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Modelscited by 237
  21. 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modificationscited by 231
  22. 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attackscited by 230
  23. 2023Using an LLM to Help With Code Understandingcited by 228
  24. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 223
  25. 2025Qwen3Guard Technical Reportcited by 155
  26. 2024Safety Layers in Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Securitycited by 134
  27. 2024Language Models are Homer Simpson! Safety Re-Alignment of Fine-tuned Language Models through Task Arithmeticcited by 112
  28. 2025Subliminal Learning: Language models transmit behavioral traits via hidden signals in datacited by 95
  29. 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 94
  30. 2023Prompt Packer: Deceiving LLMs through Compositional Instruction with Hidden Attackscited by 35
  31. 2025NeuroStrike: Neuron-Level Attacks on Aligned LLMscited by 22
  32. 2025TwinBreak: Jailbreaking LLM Security Alignments based on Twin Promptscited by 19
  33. 2025Pangu Pro MoE: Mixture of Grouped Experts for Efficient Sparsitycited by 18
  34. 2024Buffer Overflow in Mixture of Expertscited by 13
  35. 2024Stealing User Prompts from Mixture of Expertscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Defending MoE LLMs against Harmful Fine-Tuning via Safety Routing Alignment
  2. 2026Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
  3. 2026SEAL: Reinforcing Global Safety in Mixture-of-Experts through Shared Expert ALignment
  4. 2026MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized Expertise
  5. 2025Exploiting the Experts: Unauthorized Compression in MoE-LLMs
  6. 2024SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models
  7. 2025Activation Approximations Can Incur Safety Vulnerabilities Even in Aligned LLMs: Comprehensive Analysis and Defense
  8. 2026Understanding and Preserving Safety in Fine-Tuned LLMs