mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Discrete Annotation, Continuous Preference: Rethinking Supervision for Accurate and Generalizable Aesthetic Image Cropping

arXiv 2610.00582 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Aesthetic image cropping aims to identify the optimal crop of an image in terms of aesthetics and composition. While supervision based on annotated data is fundamental, the field has been hindered by a long-standing problem: existing datasets suffer from (1) human subjectivity and (2) rigid discreteness confined to fixed sampling grids. These flawed annotations not only limit the accuracy and generalization of trained models but also severely distort fair evaluation. To overcome this, we propose to model human cropping preference as a multi-peaked, continuous, and sharp field over the crop space. We introduce the Continuous Preference Field (CPF), which recovers a dense preference landscape from discrete annotations through (1) peak clustering, (2) off-lattice refinement, (3) negative shaping, and (4) field assembly. Based on this, we train CPIC, a VLM-based cropping model optimized via GRPO with the CPF reward, which overcomes template collapse, achieving state-of-the-art performance and exceptional out-of-domain generalization. Finally, to resolve the long-standing benchmark evaluation crisis, we introduce CPICD, a comprehensive recalibration of existing ground-truth boxes. By leveraging the CPF to correct grid-bound artifacts across mainstream benchmarks, CPICD establishes a rigorous and reliable foundation for future cropping research. Extensive experiments and user studies demonstrate the superiority of our CPF, CPIC, and CPICD. Code, model, and data are available at https://github.com/zzqingz/CPIC.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
  4. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  5. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  6. 2024LGM: Large Multi-View Gaussian Model for High-Resolution 3D Content Creationcited by 739
  7. 2019Deep Image Blendingcited by 62
  8. 2019Reliable and Efficient Image Cropping: A Grid Anchor based Approachcited by 33
  9. 2017Quantitative Analysis of Automatic Image Cropping Algorithms: A Dataset and Comparative Studycited by 27
  10. 2019Grid Anchor based Image Cropping: A New Benchmark and An Efficient Modelcited by 26
  11. 2017Learning to Compose with Professional Photographs on the Webcited by 25
  12. 2021Image Composition Assessment with Saliency-augmented Multi-pattern Poolingcited by 21
12 more
  1. 2023Learning Subject-Aware Cropping by Outpainting Professional Photoscited by 12
  2. 2022Human-centric Image Cropping with Partition-aware and Content-preserving Featurescited by 11
  3. 2024Cropper: Vision-Language Model for Image Cropping through In-Context Learningcited by 11
  4. 2023Beyond Image Borders: Learning Feature Extrapolation for Unbounded Image Compositioncited by 10
  5. 2026The Fourth Challenge on Image Super-Resolution (×4) at NTIRE 2026: Benchmark Results and Method Overviewcited by 10
  6. 2024Dog-IQA: Standard-guided Zero-shot MLLM for Mix-grained Image Quality Assessmentcited by 9
  7. 2025ProCrop: Learning Aesthetic Image Cropping from Professional Compositionscited by 8
  8. 2026The First Challenge on Remote Sensing Infrared Image Super-Resolution at NTIRE 2026: Benchmark Results and Method Overviewcited by 7
  9. 2026Venus: Benchmarking and Empowering Multimodal Large Language Models for Aesthetic Guidance and Croppingcited by 5
  10. 2026Accelerating Rectified Flow Models via Trajectory-Aware Cachingcited by 2
  11. 2026DRScaffold: Boosting Dense-Scene Reasoning in Lightweight Vision Language Modelscited by 1
  12. 2026COMEX: A Composition-Grounded Benchmark and Learning Framework for Explainable Aesthetic Image Croppingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FrameLite: Decision-Oriented Aesthetic Cropping with a Compact Vision-Language Model
  2. 2026CROP: Expert-Aligned Image Cropping via Compositional Reasoning and Optimizing Preference
  3. 2025AesCrop: Aesthetic-driven Cropping Guided by Composition
  4. 2022ClipCrop: Conditioned Cropping Driven by Vision-Language Model
  5. 2026Preferences Order, Ratings Anchor: From Fused Expert Aesthetic Ground Truth to Self-Distillation
  6. 2026ShutterMuse: Capture-Time Photography Guidance with MLLMs
  7. 2026Beyond Binary Preference: Aligning Diffusion Models to Fine-grained Criteria by Decoupling Attributes
  8. 2026Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation to Individual Taste