mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

One-Step Generative Modeling via Training Dynamics Action

arXiv 2610.00518 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One-step generative models construct a static generator through iterative training-time transport. Existing transport objectives primarily assess distributional motion, although a neural generator needs to realize the requested sample displacements jointly through shared parameter updates. The training-time construction raises the question: once training becomes the iterative process that constructs the final one-step map, what to optimize: the next distributional move, or the route by which the finite generator learns the final map? To address the question, we introduce Training Dynamics Action (TDAction), which selects transport targets according to local shared-parameter realization cost while retaining a prescribed level of distributional progress. We formulate the cost as a soft-terminal control problem and derive a closed-form Batch Tangent Action-to-Go value that accounts for parameter effort and terminal mismatch. The criterion captures cross-sample interactions omitted by independent pairwise costs; under isotropic mobility, the criterion agrees with quadratic Euclidean assignment for deterministic balanced couplings. Randomized tangent probes provide a low-rank implementation that constructs shared detached targets without adding an inference-time trajectory. Controlled studies examine the relationship between generator geometry, transport selection, and realized local action. On ImageNet 256×256, TDAction attains an FID below 1.1 without distillation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

35 of 45 references.

References · 35

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  3. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  4. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  5. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
  6. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  7. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  8. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  9. 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,778
  10. 2022MaskGIT: Masked Generative Image Transformercited by 1,082
  11. 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,005
  12. 2024SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformerscited by 707
23 more
  1. 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 666
  2. 2024Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantizationcited by 644
  3. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 524
  4. 2023Scaling up GANs for Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 492
  5. 2022StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasetscited by 489
  6. 2023Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Modelscited by 430
  7. 2024One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Modelscited by 373
  8. 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 310
  9. 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoderscited by 275
  10. 2025Improved Mean Flows: On the Challenges of Fastforward Generative Modelscited by 102
  11. 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 98
  12. 2022Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samplescited by 94
  13. 2025PixelFlow: Pixel-Space Generative Models with Flowcited by 91
  14. 2025PixelDiT: Pixel Diffusion Transformers for Image Generationcited by 75
  15. 2025DeCo: Frequency-Decoupled Pixel Diffusion for End-to-End Image Generationcited by 55
  16. 2025AlphaFlow: Understanding and Improving MeanFlow Modelscited by 40
  17. 2025Transition Models: Rethinking the Generative Learning Objectivecited by 32
  18. 2026Sinkhorn-Drifting Generative Modelscited by 20
  19. 2026One-Step Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 18
  20. 2025Beyond Optimal Transport: Model-Aligned Coupling for Flow Matchingcited by 13
  21. 2026Drifting Fields are not Conservativecited by 11
  22. 2025Adversarial Flow Modelscited by 10
  23. 2026Expected Batch Optimal Transport Plans and Consequences for Flow Matchingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.