Conversational Capture: A Trajectory-Level Framework for Evaluating Generative Engine Optimization in Multi-turn Human-Agent Interaction
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Agentic RAG, agents and memory also fits: Conversational and speech RAG
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) shapes content to increase its likelihood of being cited by answer engines built on retrieval-augmented large language models. GEO is typically evaluated as a single-turn property: for a fixed query, an evaluator measures a source's visibility in one answer. We argue that the single answer is an inadequate unit of analysis. Human-agent information seeking forms a closed loop: the agent's answer changes the user's beliefs and therefore the next question, which in turn determines what the agent retrieves. We introduce conversational capture, a phenomenon in which a source cited early becomes substantially more likely to be cited again. Capture operates through a machine-side channel, history-conditioned retrieval, and a human-side channel, follow-up questions directed toward the captured source. We formalize the interaction as a two-layer closed-loop system and derive trajectory-level constructs: cumulative conversational visibility; a direct/feedback decomposition of trajectory gain; a nested split of the feedback term into machine-side and human-side channels; a capture coefficient; a compounding ratio; and a misranking diagnostic. Using reinforcement-process (P'olya-urn) theory, we prove that the feedback term is zero under single-turn evaluation and that GEO's cumulative payoff grows superlinearly with conversation length while capture develops. A model-derived illustration shows that the feedback term can exceed the direct term, the compounding ratio exceeds two within ten turns, and single-turn and trajectory rankings agree only weakly (Kendall's τ = 0.4). We connect the human channel to information foraging, trust calibration, and Bayesian persuasion, and discuss design implications for answer engines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
9 of 26 references.
References · 9
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 461
- 2020Open-Domain Question Answering Goes Conversational via Question Rewritingcited by 148
- 2020Open-Retrieval Conversational Question Answeringcited by 99
- 2024Manipulating Large Language Models to Increase Product Visibilitycited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agentic Conversational Search with Contextualized Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025InfoQuest: Evaluating Multi-Turn Dialogue Agents for Open-Ended Conversations with Hidden Context
- 2026When Your Agent Opens the Chat App: Agent-Controlled Search over Raw Chat Logs Rivals Structured Memory
- 2024Language Models in Dialogue: Conversational Maxims for Human-AI Interactions
- 2026AgentLongBench: A Controllable Long Benchmark For Long-Contexts Agents via Environment Rollouts
- 2024Toward Conversational Agents with Context and Time Sensitive Long-term Memory
- 2026HERO: Human-profile Enhanced Retrieval Optimization Framework for Long-term Agent Memory
- 2026Characterizing Web Search by Conversational LLM Agents: From Search Decisions and Strategies to Results and Responses