CAST: Causal Advantage-Structured Training with Spatially Grounded Compositional Rewards for Diffusion Models
On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling also fits: Diffusion and flow policies for robotics
Abstract (arXiv)
Online reinforcement learning has been extended to flow matching for diffusion model (DM) image generation. However, this paradigm faces three limitations: (1) Window selection. Existing methods manually set the stochastic differential equation (SDE) sampling window, i.e., the denoising steps where exploration noise is injected. We instead determine it from each model's denoising trajectory. (2) Reward saturation. Current methods rely on scoring models trained on human annotations; we find that such scores are extremely high and nearly indistinguishable on the latest SOTA open-source DMs, making advantage estimation largely ineffective. (3) Sample inefficiency. A single scalar reward collapses different failure modes into almost identical scores, leaving minimal gradient guidance for targeted improvement. To address these issues, we propose CAST (Causal Advantage-Structured Training), an RL fine-tuning method for pretrained DMs, which (1) identifies the denoising step at which each model fixes the objects and their spatial arrangement in the image and uses that timing to set the SDE window, (2) decomposes each prompt via Causal Scene Graphs (CSG) into verifiable-atoms, i.e., minimal semantic units such as an object, count, attribute, or spatial relation that can each be checked independently, and rewards each atom separately, and (3) projects the signed atom-level advantages into pixel space through teacher-forced attention and uses them to spatially weight the SDE policy objective. We fine-tune two of the strongest open-source DMs, FLUX.2-dev and Qwen-Image-2512, with CAST, and evaluate them on GenEval 2, a compositional benchmark, and on Qwen-Image-Bench for overall quality. Within almost the same training budget, CAST's improvement over the base model on the most challenging GenEval 2 prompts is up to 3.07x that of Flow-GRPO, while overall generation quality also improves.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 30 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
30 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025LINA: Learning INterventions Adaptively for Physical Alignment and Generalization in Diffusion Models15 Dec
- 2025Z-Image: An Efficient Image Generation Foundation Model with Single-Stream Diffusion Transformer27 Nov
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis5 Mar
- 2022Perception Prioritized Training of Diffusion Models1 Apr
Other references · 26
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2022Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Controlcited by 2,431
- 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
- 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
- 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 982
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
- 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
- 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RLcited by 661
- 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
14 more
- 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 428
- 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 320
- 2025MixGRPO: Unlocking Flow-based GRPO Efficiency with Mixed ODE-SDEcited by 178
- 2024VisionReward: Fine-Grained Multi-Dimensional Human Preference Learning for Image and Video Generationcited by 156
- 2024Learning Multi-dimensional Human Preference for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 106
- 2025GenEval 2: Addressing Benchmark Drift in Text-to-Image Evaluationcited by 52
- 2026HiDream-O1-Image: A Natively Unified Image Generative Foundation Model with Pixel-level Unified Transformercited by 32
- 2026Qwen-Image-Bench: From Generation to Creation in Text-to-Image Evaluationcited by 22
- 2026DenseGRPO: From Sparse to Dense Reward for Flow Matching Model Alignmentcited by 21
- 2025Neighbor GRPO: Contrastive ODE Policy Optimization Aligns Flow Modelscited by 16
- 2026Stepwise Credit Assignment for GRPO on Flow-Matching Modelscited by 10
- 2025Focus-N-Fix: Region-Aware Fine-Tuning for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 9
- 2026Alleviating Sparse Rewards by Modeling Step-Wise and Long-Term Sampling Effects in Flow-Based GRPOcited by 9
- 2026AEGPO: Adaptive Entropy-Guided Policy Optimization for Diffusion Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Coefficients-Preserving Sampling for Reinforcement Learning with Flow Matching
- 2026Precise: SDE-Consistent Stochastic Sampling for RL Post-Training of Flow-Matching Models
- 2025Towards Better Alignment: Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning Against Sparse Rewards
- 2026Do Less, Achieve More: Do We Need Every-Step Optimization for RL Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models?
- 2025CoCA: Step-level Reward for Free in RL-based T2I Diffusion Model Fine-tuning
- 2024Avoiding mode collapse in diffusion models fine-tuned with reinforcement learning
- 2026PAST: Prompt-Adaptive Sampling Termination for Efficient Diffusion Model
- 2025Understanding Sampler Stochasticity in Training Diffusion Models for RLHF