Shared Phase and Retention Control for Efficient Adaptive Spectral Recurrence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As new evidence arrives, a sequence model must update what it remembers and how memory influences predictions. While Transformers incur computation and cache costs scaling with context length, fixed-state recurrent models offer constant-memory inference. However, linear and spectral recurrences traditionally rely on static transitions, failing to dynamically revise how stored representations decay or rotate. While recent selective architectures introduce input-dependent transitions, they assign independent controls to every memory mode, coupling control cost to state capacity. We show that high-dimensional spectral memory does not require high-dimensional control, and introduce Shared Phase and Retention Control for Efficient Adaptive Spectral Recurrence (SPARC). SPARC employs just two input-dependent scalar signals to coordinate memory retention and phase rotation across heterogeneous complex modes, while preserving mode-specific baseline timescales and frequencies. Its diagonal affine recurrence supports parallel associative scans for sequence-level BPTT as well as exact structured Real-Time Recurrent Learning (RTRL) for online credit assignment. Across partially observable continuous control, POPGym, and sequence classification, SPARC achieves a 9.09% relative return improvement on Walker-P and a 1.36% relative accuracy gain on FordA over second-best methods. On an NVIDIA Blackwell GPU, our implementation reduces recurrent-mixer training latency by 18.2%-34.2% in fixed-token workloads and accelerates scans by 3.1x-4.7x over an optimized RG-LRU baseline. These results show that two shared control signals can efficiently govern adaptive spectral memory across online and full-sequence settings. Code is available at https://github.com/Botwwt/sparc.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 30 references.
References · 22
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
- 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,336
- 2022Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modelingcited by 788
- 2020HiPPO: Recurrent Memory with Optimal Polynomial Projectionscited by 605
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
- 2023Resurrecting Recurrent Neural Networks for Long Sequencescited by 408
- 2024Griffin: Mixing Gated Linear Recurrences with Local Attention for Efficient Language Modelscited by 242
- 2017Parallelizing Linear Recurrent Neural Nets Over Sequence Lengthcited by 127
10 more
- 2026Mamba-3: Improved Sequence Modeling using State Space Principlescited by 89
- 2024RecurrentGemma: Moving Past Transformers for Efficient Open Language Modelscited by 64
- 2023POPGym: Benchmarking Partially Observable Reinforcement Learningcited by 62
- 2017Unbiased Online Recurrent Optimizationcited by 47
- 2023GateLoop: Fully Data-Controlled Linear Recurrence for Sequence Modelingcited by 46
- 2024Oscillatory State-Space Modelscited by 39
- 2018Approximating Real-Time Recurrent Learning with Random Kronecker Factorscited by 29
- 2023Online learning of long-range dependenciescited by 25
- 2020A Practical Sparse Approximation for Real Time Recurrent Learningcited by 18
- 2024Real-Time Recurrent Learning using Trace Units in Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.