Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Whether quantum computation can reduce the amount of data sampled from an unknown probability distribution required to learn a prediction rule is a fundamental question in quantum machine learning. Quantum PAC learning studies this question using quantum data as a quantum state whose squared amplitudes encode the unknown distribution from which classical learning data are sampled. With only copies of such quantum data, the optimal worst-case sample complexity asymptotically matches that of classical PAC learning. In contrast, access to both a state-preparation unitary for this state and its inverse can improve the query-complexity dependence on the accuracy parameter in realizable learning. However, it has remained unclear whether forward-only access allows such an improvement. In this work, taking the worst case over compatible state-preparation unitaries and their finite ambient dimensions, we show that the optimal forward-only query complexities of realizable and agnostic learning are, respectively, Theta((d+log(1/δ))/varepsilon) and Theta((d+log(1/δ))/varepsilon2), where d is the VC dimension of the concept class, varepsilon the accuracy parameter, and δ the failure probability. These bounds match the optimal sample complexities with classical data or quantum data copies. To prove them, we establish a reduction using q copies of the prepared state to approximate the Haar-averaged output of any q-query forward-only algorithm. These results show that forward-only access cannot provide an asymptotic query-complexity advantage over learning from classical data or quantum data copies in this worst-case setting, and establish the essential role of inverse access in the known realizable-setting improvement. Our reduction also provides a new framework for analyzing limitations of forward state-preparation access via state-copy lower bounds.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
8 of 37 references.
References · 8
- 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
- 2016Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithmscited by 32
- 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 21
- 2022On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical datacited by 15
- 2022Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariescited by 6
- 2023Advantage of Quantum Machine Learning from General Computational Advantagescited by 4
- 2025Amplitude amplification and estimation require inversescited by 4
- 2025Are controlled unitaries helpful?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.