mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Advantage of Sample Complexity in Quantum PAC Learning Requires Inverse Access to State-Preparation Unitaries

arXiv 2609.38403 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026quant-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Whether quantum computation can reduce the amount of data sampled from an unknown probability distribution required to learn a prediction rule is a fundamental question in quantum machine learning. Quantum PAC learning studies this question using quantum data as a quantum state whose squared amplitudes encode the unknown distribution from which classical learning data are sampled. With only copies of such quantum data, the optimal worst-case sample complexity asymptotically matches that of classical PAC learning. In contrast, access to both a state-preparation unitary for this state and its inverse can improve the query-complexity dependence on the accuracy parameter in realizable learning. However, it has remained unclear whether forward-only access allows such an improvement. In this work, taking the worst case over compatible state-preparation unitaries and their finite ambient dimensions, we show that the optimal forward-only query complexities of realizable and agnostic learning are, respectively, Theta((d+log(1/δ))/varepsilon) and Theta((d+log(1/δ))/varepsilon2), where d is the VC dimension of the concept class, varepsilon the accuracy parameter, and δ the failure probability. These bounds match the optimal sample complexities with classical data or quantum data copies. To prove them, we establish a reduction using q copies of the prepared state to approximate the Haar-averaged output of any q-query forward-only algorithm. These results show that forward-only access cannot provide an asymptotic query-complexity advantage over learning from classical data or quantum data copies in this worst-case setting, and establish the essential role of inverse access in the known realizable-setting improvement. Our reduction also provides a new framework for analyzing limitations of forward state-preparation access via state-copy lower bounds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

8 of 37 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learningcited by 72
  2. 2016Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithmscited by 32
  3. 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 21
  4. 2022On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical datacited by 15
  5. 2022Quantum tomography using state-preparation unitariescited by 6
  6. 2023Advantage of Quantum Machine Learning from General Computational Advantagescited by 4
  7. 2025Amplitude amplification and estimation require inversescited by 4
  8. 2025Are controlled unitaries helpful?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.