mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Amplitude amplification and estimation require inverses

arXiv 2507.23787 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2025quant-ph cs.CC cs.DScited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We prove that the generic quantum speedups for brute-force search and counting only hold when the process we apply them to can be efficiently inverted. The algorithms speeding up these problems, amplitude amplification and amplitude estimation, assume the ability to apply a state preparation unitary U and its inverse U^dagger; we give problem instances based on trace estimation where no algorithm which uses only U beats the naive, quadratically slower approach. Our proof of this is simple and goes through the compressed oracle method introduced by Zhandry. Since these two subroutines are responsible for the ubiquity of the quadratic "Grover" speedup in quantum algorithms, our result explains why such speedups are far harder to come by in the settings of quantum learning, metrology, and sensing. In these settings, U models the evolution of an experimental system, so implementing U^dagger can be much harder -- tantamount to reversing time within the system. Our result suggests a dichotomy: without inverse access, quantum speedups are scarce; with it, quantum speedups abound.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.