mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Latent Correlation-Based Multiview Learning and Self-Supervision: An Identifiability Perspective

arXiv 2106.07115 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multiple views of data, both naturally acquired (e.g., image and audio) and artificially produced (e.g., via adding different noise to data samples), have proven useful in enhancing representation learning. Natural views are often handled by multiview analysis tools, e.g., (deep) canonical correlation analysis [(D)CCA], while the artificial ones are frequently used in self-supervised learning (SSL) paradigms, e.g., BYOL and Barlow Twins. Both types of approaches often involve learning neural feature extractors such that the embeddings of data exhibit high cross-view correlations. Although intuitive, the effectiveness of correlation-based neural embedding is mostly empirically validated. This work aims to understand latent correlation maximization-based deep multiview learning from a latent component identification viewpoint. An intuitive generative model of multiview data is adopted, where the views are different nonlinear mixtures of shared and private components. Since the shared components are view/distortion-invariant, representing the data using such components is believed to reveal the identity of the samples effectively and robustly. Under this model, latent correlation maximization is shown to guarantee the extraction of the shared components across views (up to certain ambiguities). In addition, it is further shown that the private information in each view can be provably disentangled from the shared using proper regularization design. A finite sample analysis, which has been rare in nonlinear mixture identifiability study, is also presented. The theoretical results and newly designed regularization are tested on a series of tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2021.

Builds on

28 of 66 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  6. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
  7. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  8. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  9. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  10. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  11. 2018Multimodal Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translationcited by 795
  12. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
16 more
  1. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  2. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
  3. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
  4. 2018Diverse Image-to-Image Translation via Disentangled Representationscited by 296
  5. 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 278
  6. 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 270
  7. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 254
  8. 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
  9. 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 220
  10. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
  11. 2020Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelscited by 146
  12. 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
  13. 2016Deep Variational Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 44
  14. 2018Information Constraints on Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 33
  15. 2017Deep Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 32
  16. 2020Reliable Detection of Unknown Cell-Edge Users Via Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 12; 2024: 7; 2025: 6; 2026: 8.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Multi-View Causal Representation Learning with Partial Observabilitycited by 72
  2. 2023Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 58
  3. 2023Causal Component Analysiscited by 56
  4. 2023Understanding Masked Autoencoders via Hierarchical Latent Variable Modelscited by 39
  5. 2023Causal Representation Learning Made Identifiable by Grouping of Observational Variablescited by 30
  6. 2023Identification of Nonlinear Latent Hierarchical Modelscited by 27
  7. 2024Marrying Causal Representation Learning with Dynamical Systems for Sciencecited by 22
  8. 2023Self-Supervised Disentanglement by Leveraging Structure in Data Augmentationscited by 16
  9. 2023Upper Bounding Barlow Twins: A Novel Filter for Multi-Relational Clusteringcited by 12
  10. 2024Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environmentcited by 12
  11. 2025On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation Learningcited by 9
  12. 2025Position: An Empirically Grounded Identifiability Theory Will Accelerate Self-Supervised Learning Researchcited by 9
25 more
  1. 2022On Finite-Sample Identifiability of Contrastive Learning-Based Nonlinear Independent Component Analysiscited by 7
  2. 2023Latent Representation and Simulation of Markov Processes via Time-Lagged Information Bottleneckcited by 6
  3. 2023Revisiting Deep Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 6
  4. 2023Latent Processes Identification From Multi-View Time Seriescited by 5
  5. 2024Towards Identifiable Unsupervised Domain Translation: A Diversified Distribution Matching Approachcited by 5
  6. 2023Learning multi-modal generative models with permutation-invariant encoders and tighter variational objectivescited by 4
  7. 2025Disentanglement of Variations with Multimodal Generative Modelingcited by 4
  8. 2025Diverse Influence Component Analysis: A Geometric Approach to Nonlinear Mixture Identifiabilitycited by 4
  9. 2024Identifiable Shared Component Analysis of Unpaired Multimodal Mixturescited by 3
  10. 2022Provable Subspace Identification Under Post-Nonlinear Mixturescited by 2
  11. 2024Content-Style Learning from Unaligned Domains: Identifiability under Unknown Latent Dimensionscited by 2
  12. 2022Self-supervised multimodal neuroimaging yields predictive representations for a spectrum of Alzheimer's phenotypescited by 1
  13. 2024Unsupervised discovery of the shared and private geometry in multi-view datacited by 1
  14. 2025Provable Affine Identifiability of Nonlinear CCA under Latent Distributional Priorscited by 1
  15. 2026Unregistered Spectral Image Fusion: Unmixing, Adversarial Learning, and Recoverabilitycited by 1
  16. 2026Content-Style Identification via Differential Independencecited by 1
  17. 2021Communication-Efficient Federated Linear and Deep Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysiscited by 0
  18. 2024Identifiability of a statistical model with two latent vectors: Importance of the dimensionality relation and application to graph embeddingcited by 0
  19. 2025Eigenfunction Extraction for Ordered Representation Learningcited by 0
  20. 2026Provable Subspace Identification of Nonlinear Multi-view CCAcited by 0
  21. 2026Emergent Symbolic Structure in Health Foundation Models: Extraction, Alignment, and Cross-Modal Transfercited by 0
  22. 2026PEIRA: Learning Predictive Encoders through Inter-View Regressor Alignmentcited by 0
  23. 2026Domain Transfer Becomes Identifiable via a Single Alignmentcited by 0
  24. 2026Teacher-Student Representational Alignment for Reinforcement Learning-Driven Imitation Learningcited by 0
  25. 2026Predictive Self-Supervised Learning Provably Identifies Stochastic Signals under Nuisancecited by 0