WISE-ATTA: When to Ask for Labels in Budgeted Active Test-Time Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active test-time adaptation (ATTA) improves robustness under distribution shift by updating a deployed model during inference while selectively querying supervision. However, most existing ATTA methods implicitly assume that supervision can be requested for every incoming test batch, which can incur substantial annotation cost over long test streams. In this work, we introduce budgeted ATTA in which labels are available for only a fraction of test batches. This formulation shifts the central challenge from deciding what to label within a batch to deciding when supervision should be applied over time. To address this challenge, we propose a budget-aware approach WISE-ATTA that allocates supervision over the test stream based on lightweight signals computed online, prioritizing periods where supervision is likely to be most useful. When a batch is selected for supervision, we further employ a drift-based sample selection criterion that targets samples exhibiting ongoing, unconverged adaptation dynamics, enabling effective updates from a single labeled example. We evaluate this approach on synthetic corruptions (ImageNet-C) and natural distribution shifts (ImageNet-R/K/A). Across settings, WISE-ATTA achieves competitive or improved performance compared to recent ATTA methods while requiring substantially fewer labels. Overall, we find that the timing of supervision is a key, yet underexplored, aspect of active test-time adaptation. Code: https://github.com/Muhammad-Huzaifaa/WISE-ATTA
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
39 of 47 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
27 more
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
- 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 336
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
- 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
- 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
- 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
- 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 54
- 2021MixNorm: Test-Time Adaptation Through Online Normalization Estimationcited by 47
- 2022A Probabilistic Framework for Lifelong Test-Time Adaptationcited by 46
- 2023Towards Real-World Test-Time Adaptation: Tri-Net Self-Training with Balanced Normalizationcited by 34
- 2024Active Test-Time Adaptation: Theoretical Analyses and An Algorithmcited by 18
- 2024Towards Robust and Efficient Cloud-Edge Elastic Model Adaptation via Selective Entropy Distillationcited by 11
- 2024Decoupled Prototype Learning for Reliable Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
- 2025Effortless Active Labeling for Long-Term Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
- 2024Exploring Human-in-the-Loop Test-Time Adaptation by Synergizing Active Learning and Model Selectioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.