mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Decoupled Prototype Learning for Reliable Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2401.08703 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2024cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time adaptation (TTA) is a task that continually adapts a pre-trained source model to the target domain during inference. One popular approach involves fine-tuning model with cross-entropy loss according to estimated pseudo-labels. However, its performance is significantly affected by noisy pseudo-labels. This study reveals that minimizing the classification error of each sample causes the cross-entropy loss's vulnerability to label noise. To address this issue, we propose a novel Decoupled Prototype Learning (DPL) method that features prototype-centric loss computation. First, we decouple the optimization of class prototypes. For each class prototype, we reduce its distance with positive samples and enlarge its distance with negative samples in a contrastive manner. This strategy prevents the model from overfitting to noisy pseudo-labels. Second, we propose a memory-based strategy to enhance DPL's robustness for the small batch sizes often encountered in TTA. We update each class's pseudo-feature from a memory in a momentum manner and insert an additional DPL loss. Finally, we introduce a consistency regularization-based approach to leverage samples with unconfident pseudo-labels. This approach transfers feature styles of samples with unconfident pseudo-labels to those with confident pseudo-labels. Thus, more reliable samples for TTA are created. The experimental results demonstrate that our methods achieve state-of-the-art performance on domain generalization benchmarks, and reliably improve the performance of self-training-based methods on image corruption benchmarks. The code will be released.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2024.

Builds on

72 of 98 references.

References · 72

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  6. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  7. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  8. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  9. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  10. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
  11. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  12. 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 2,010
38 more
  1. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  2. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,446
  3. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  4. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
  5. 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,188
  6. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  7. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
  8. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  9. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  10. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 657
  11. 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 623
  12. 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 566
  13. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
  14. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  15. 2019Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 450
  16. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  17. 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
  18. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
  19. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 359
  20. 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 335
  21. 2020Learning to Generate Novel Domains for Domain Generalizationcited by 296
  22. 2021A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalizationcited by 290
  23. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  24. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
  25. 2021Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 258
  26. 2019Episodic Training for Domain Generalizationcited by 245
  27. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 226
  28. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 189
  29. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
  30. 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
  31. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 151
  32. 2018Domain Generalization via Conditional Invariant Representationcited by 146
  33. 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
  34. 2022Uncertainty Modeling for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 125
  35. 2020Learning to Generalize Unseen Domains via Memory-based Multi-Source Meta-Learning for Person Re-Identificationcited by 110
  36. 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
  37. 2023Sharpness-Aware Gradient Matching for Domain Generalizationcited by 102
  38. 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.