mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Task-Relevant Null-Space Residuals for Non-Injective Neural Mappings

arXiv 2609.37272 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

New in Efficient LLM inference and serving; no direction yet. Efficient LLM inference and serving

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-injective mappings in neural networks map distinct inputs to the same representation, thereby implicitly inducing equivalence relations in the input space. However, the input differences eliminated by these mappings may still be required by downstream tasks, creating a mismatch between operator-induced indistinguishability and task-required distinctions. For non-injective linear operators realized in the current forward pass, their null spaces exactly characterize these invisible input variations. We propose Task-Relevant Null-Space Residuals (NSR), a general residual framework for non-injective linear mappings. NSR combines null-space component extraction from pre-mapping representations, member-level encoding and gating, and application-specific integration to exploit potentially task-relevant information under downstream supervision while preserving the original aggregation or merging rules. We evaluate NSR in two structurally different settings: token merging and graph aggregation. In token merging, NSR achieves higher semantic segmentation performance than the corresponding compressed baselines in 34 out of 36 evaluated configurations, with a maximum observed gain of 31.51 mIoU points under strong compression. In graph aggregation, NSR achieves 100% training accuracy on Tree-NeighborsMatch at depths d=2--6 across three backbones, alongside gains on heterophilic node classification and molecular graph regression. Together, these results support null-space residuals as a practical complement to non-injective linear mappings, enabling downstream models to learn from input distinctions invisible in the original operator's output.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

25 of 33 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  5. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  6. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  7. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  8. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  9. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  10. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  11. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
  12. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 877
13 more
  1. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 860
  2. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 680
  3. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
  4. 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 478
  5. 2023A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?cited by 343
  6. 2018i-RevNet: Deep Invertible Networkscited by 137
  7. 2018Excessive Invariance Causes Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 66
  8. 2022Characterizing Graph Datasets for Node Classification: Homophily-Heterophily Dichotomy and Beyondcited by 60
  9. 2024Accelerating Transformers with Spectrum-Preserving Token Mergingcited by 35
  10. 2024ALGM: Adaptive Local-then-Global Token Merging for Efficient Semantic Segmentation with Plain Vision Transformerscited by 28
  11. 2024Learning to Merge Tokens via Decoupled Embedding for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 21
  12. 2021LiftPool: Bidirectional ConvNet Poolingcited by 11
  13. 2026MPM: Mutual Pair Merging for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Distilling Linearized Behavior into Non-Linear Fine-Tuning for Effective Task Arithmetic
  2. 2026Make it SING: Analyzing Semantic Invariants in Classifiers
  3. 2025The Non-Linear Representation Dilemma: Is Causal Abstraction Enough for Mechanistic Interpretability?
  4. 2026Where Post-Training Quantization Breaks Text Embedders: A Measured Map Across Four Embedder Families
  5. 2026Traversing the solution space of neural networks with Hessian Null Space Continuation
  6. 2024ResiDual Transformer Alignment with Spectral Decomposition
  7. 2026NSFL: A Post-Training Neuro-Symbolic Fuzzy Logic Framework for Boolean Operators in Neural Embeddings
  8. 2024VISTA: A Panoramic View of Neural Representations