mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Absorbed in Inertia: Activation Analysis for Computer-Use Agents

arXiv 2609.37176 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → GUI and mobile agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer-use agents have become increasingly capable of executing tasks on live desktops through natural-language instructions, based on trajectories of screenshots, actions, and reasoning. We discover that they can stealthily exhibit inertia, in which they repeat fruitless actions despite recognizing that these actions are ineffective. We hypothesize that inertia is reflected in the agent's internal state, i.e., the activation values of the agent's underlying model, and propose a protocol to measure the relationship between the two. Extensive analysis of high-dimensional activation states shows that inertia corresponds to an absorbing region of activation space, where activation values become stale across actions and even after attempts to steer them. We conjecture that drastically changing the agents' activations by re-initializing them is necessary to escape inertia. Specifically, we propose R3 (Reset, Reroute, Restore), which temporarily resets the agent's context trajectory to escape the absorbing region and then restores the historical context to effectively complete the task. Our approach yields 17-55% lower measured inertia across models relative to unmodified agents. These results suggest that changing the context can interrupt recurrence more effectively than directly steering the resulting activations. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/vlm-agent-defense-D076

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in GUI and mobile agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

36 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026OpenComputer: Verifiable Software Worlds for Computer-Use Agents19 May
  2. 2026VLAA-GUI: Knowing When to Stop, Recover, and Search, A Modular Framework for GUI Automation23 Apr
  3. 2026Don't Act Blindly: Robust GUI Automation via Action-Effect Verification and Self-Correction7 Apr
  4. 2026Mobile-Agent-v3.5: Multi-platform Fundamental GUI Agents15 Feb
  5. 2025OpenCUA: Open Foundations for Computer-Use Agents12 Aug
  6. 2025ProgRM: Build Better GUI Agents with Progress Rewards23 May
  7. 2025UI-TARS: Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents21 Jan
  8. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments11 Apr

Other references · 28

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  5. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  6. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  7. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
  8. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 712
  9. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
  10. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
  11. 2025MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agentscited by 238
  12. 2025The Danger of Overthinking: Examining the Reasoning-Action Dilemma in Agentic Taskscited by 152
16 more
  1. 2025The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational Independencecited by 115
  2. 2025OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMscited by 96
  3. 2022Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generationcited by 94
  4. 2020A Theoretical Analysis of the Repetition Problem in Text Generationcited by 83
  5. 2025AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progresscited by 77
  6. 2026AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectoriescited by 60
  7. 2026EvoCUA: Evolving Computer Use Agents via Learning from Scalable Synthetic Experiencecited by 53
  8. 2023L2MAC: Large Language Model Automatic Computer for Extensive Code Generationcited by 30
  9. 2024Controlling Large Language Model Agents with Entropic Activation Steeringcited by 29
  10. 2025GUI-Shepherd: Reliable Process Reward and Verification for Long-Sequence GUI Taskscited by 26
  11. 2025Learning to Steer: Input-dependent Steering for Multimodal LLMscited by 15
  12. 2025GUI-PRA: Process Reward Agent for GUI Taskscited by 9
  13. 2026TACT: Mitigating Overthinking and Overacting in Coding Agents via Activation Steeringcited by 6
  14. 2026Overthinking Loops in Agents: A Structural Risk via MCP Toolscited by 5
  15. 2026Why Retrying Fails: Context Contamination in LLM Agent Pipelinescited by 4
  16. 2026Redundant or Necessary? A Benchmark for Detecting Redundant Steps in Agent Trajectoriescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Seeing Isn't Believing: Mitigating Belief Inertia via Active Intervention in Embodied Agents
  2. 2026When Actions Go Off-Task: Detecting and Correcting Misaligned Actions in Computer-Use Agents
  3. 2026Compiling and Benchmarking Task-State Horizons for Embodied Agents
  4. 2026Learn from Move: the Next Step for GUI Agents
  5. 2026From Features to Actions: Explainability in Traditional and Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2026Revisiting Open-Loop Execution in Robotics: Toward Reactive, Higher-Performing Policies
  7. 2026ProgressCompass: Embodied Progress Reward Models Are Lost Without the Right Context
  8. 2026SkillApt: Learning When to Activate Agent Skills from Counterfactual Evidence