mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Controlled Decoding Attacks on Black-Box LLMs

arXiv 2609.36956 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Manipulating next-token probabilities during generation can bypass the safety alignment of large language models. Existing approaches, however, rely on access to model weights or numerical token probabilities and therefore do not apply to interfaces that return only sampled text. Reconstructing probabilities from sampled outputs offers a possible alternative, but finite sampling produces sparse and noisy estimates, while repeating this process at every generation step incurs substantial query costs. Our empirical observations suggest that large distributional changes along successful jailbreak trajectories are concentrated at a small subset of positions, motivating selective control. We introduce method, a framework for jailbreaking through text-only continuation interfaces that permit repeated sampling and assistant-prefix continuation. Sample-Based Distribution Reconstruction combines sampled outputs with a prior over unobserved actions to obtain a usable control signal. Risk-Gated Residual Control uses the evolving response prefix to decide when to reconstruct and modify the distribution, concentrating sampling costs at selected positions. Speculative Multi-Token Execution further amortizes target calls by verifying and accepting draft prefixes that require no intervention. Across four target endpoints and three benchmarks, method achieves the highest mean score most comparisons against baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 41 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

41 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Logic Jailbreak: Efficiently Unlocking LLM Safety Restrictions Through Formal Logical Expression18 May
  2. 2025JULI: Jailbreak Large Language Models by Self-Introspection17 May
  3. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal20 Jun
  4. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep10 Jun
  5. 2024Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!19 Feb
  6. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
  7. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
  8. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
  9. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 32

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  3. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
  4. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  5. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  6. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 1,006
  7. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  8. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
  9. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 560
  10. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 486
  11. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 390
  12. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
20 more
  1. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
  2. 2024Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Modelscited by 107
  3. 2024Tuning Language Models by Proxycited by 89
  4. 2023Panoptic Scene Graph Generation with Semantics-Prototype Learningcited by 42
  5. 2025Treble Counterfactual VLMs: A Causal Approach to Hallucinationcited by 35
  6. 2024TS-Reasoner: Domain-Oriented Time Series Inference Agents for Reasoning and Automated Analysiscited by 29
  7. 2024DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 29
  8. 2025Secure On-Device Video OOD Detection Without Backpropagationcited by 19
  9. 2025Learning to Deliberate: Meta-policy Collaboration for Agentic LLMs with Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  10. 2026Auditing Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning Trees Outperforms Majority Vote and LLM-as-Judgecited by 18
  11. 2025Don't Let It Hallucinate: Premise Verification via Retrieval-Augmented Logical Reasoningcited by 15
  12. 2026Self-Compression of Chain-of-Thought via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  13. 2026FORTIS: Benchmarking Over-Privilege in Agent Skillscited by 13
  14. 2026Defenses Against Prompt Attacks Learn Surface Heuristicscited by 11
  15. 2026The Autonomy Tax: Defense Training Breaks LLM Agentscited by 9
  16. 2024Backpropagation-Free Multi-modal On-Device Model Adaptation via Cloud-Device Collaborationcited by 5
  17. 2026"Someone Hid It": Query-Agnostic Black-Box Attacks on LLM-Based Retrievalcited by 5
  18. 2026Memory Retrieval for Changing Preferencescited by 3
  19. 2026Geometry over Density: Few-Shot Cross-Domain OOD Detectioncited by 2
  20. 2026MIRROR: Learning from the Other View for Multi-Modal Reasoningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Root Defence Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding Level
  2. 2025Speculative Safety-Aware Decoding
  3. 2026SafeSpec: Fast and Safe LLM via Dynamic Reflective Sampling
  4. 2024Alignment-Enhanced Decoding:Defending via Token-Level Adaptive Refining of Probability Distributions
  5. 2026Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via In-Decoding Safety-Awareness Probing
  6. 2025Jailbreaking Large Language Diffusion Models: Revealing Hidden Safety Flaws in Diffusion-Based Text Generation
  7. 2026Secure Speculative Decoding for Large Language Models
  8. 2024Speculative Decoding via Early-exiting for Faster LLM Inference with Thompson Sampling Control Mechanism