mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RED: Reconstruction Evolution Dynamics for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection

arXiv 2609.36822 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of image generators calls for forensic cues that generalize beyond known generation mechanisms. Existing detectors often rely on static image representations or endpoint reconstruction discrepancies, leaving the evolution of intermediate reconstruction stages underexplored. We observe that the relative token predictability of real and generated images can reverse across reconstruction scales, suggesting that intermediate stages may expose forensic evidence overlooked by endpoint comparisons. Motivated by this observation, we propose RED (Reconstruction Evolution Dynamics), a framework that captures transferable forensic cues from coarse-to-fine reconstruction evolution. To our knowledge, RED is the first framework to use scale-wise token predictability to guide forensic evidence aggregation across intermediate reconstruction states. It represents the reconstruction trajectory produced by a frozen multiscale VQ-VAE in the shared feature space of a frozen CLIP encoder. To connect the observed predictability variations with visual evidence, RED learns image-adaptive stage weights from scale-wise token negative log-likelihoods provided by a frozen VAR model. A cross-stage evidence aggregation module then jointly models the original-image representation and the weighted reconstruction features, capturing complementary forensic cues through interactions along the reconstruction trajectory. Experiments on six diverse benchmarks demonstrate that RED achieves the highest average accuracy of 92.5% and average precision of 97.5% among the evaluated methods. Further evaluations show strong robustness to common image degradations, supporting the value of reconstruction evolution for generalizable AI-generated image detection. The code will be made publicly available upon acceptance of this paper.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  3. 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,023
  4. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
  5. 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
  6. 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
  7. 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 321
  8. 2024A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 189
  9. 2024A Bias-Free Training Paradigm for More General AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 67
  10. 2025Dual Data Alignment Makes AI-Generated Image Detector Easier Generalizablecited by 60
  11. 2024FIRE: Robust Detection of Diffusion-Generated Images via Frequency-Guided Reconstruction Errorcited by 47
  12. 2023Rethinking the Up-Sampling Operations in CNN-based Generative Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detectioncited by 41
7 more
  1. 2025Veritas: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Pattern-Aware Reasoningcited by 23
  2. 2026Qwen-Image-Bench: From Generation to Creation in Text-to-Image Evaluationcited by 22
  3. 2025LOTA: Bit-Planes Guided AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 11
  4. 2025Towards Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Image-Adaptive Prompt Learningcited by 9
  5. 2025Semantic Visual Anomaly Detection and Reasoning in AI-Generated Imagescited by 8
  6. 2026GPT-Image-2 in the Wild: A Twitter Dataset of Self-Reported AI-Generated Images from the First Week of Deploymentcited by 8
  7. 2026A Difference-in-Difference Approach to Detecting AI-Generated Imagescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.