mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reward-rate Policy Gradient for Efficient Machine Learning Engineering Agents

arXiv 2609.36393 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) techniques focus on maximizing expected cumulative reward, where each action assumes to take a constant unit of time. However, this assumption does not hold for agentic RL tasks such as machine learning engineering (MLE) agents, where actions involve data loading, feature engineering, and model training that take variable durations. Efficiency matters in modern agentic RL where actions are costly. To address this limitation, we adapt from continuous-time RL and Semi-Markov Decision Process (SMDP) formulation and propose Reward-rate Policy Gradient (RPG), where we focus on optimizing the reward rate -- the long-term reward per unit of time. RPG estimates the reward rate from off-policy samples, then charges each action for the time it consumes at that rate. We first conduct theoretical analysis in the bandit setting to establish that RPG approximates the optimal reward rate and empirically demonstrate it outperforms baselines while avoiding enumeration over the policy space, a known issue for an existing method. We then further apply RPG on a small language model (Qwen3.5-4B) with self-improvement loops and empirically show it obtains higher rewards within a fixed time budget than vanilla RL on MLE-Bench and NanoGPT, with a 19.2% and 85.7% margin, respectively. Our method provides a practical solution for optimizing performance under wait time considerations in modern agentic RL tasks, where actions interact with external environments and cost time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

27 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey2 Sep
  2. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Machine Learning Engineering Agents1 Sep
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning20 Mar

Other references · 24

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  6. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  7. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
  8. 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 294
  9. 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
  10. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  11. 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 206
  12. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
12 more
  1. 2023Self-Taught Optimizer (STOP): Recursively Self-Improving Code Generationcited by 128
  2. 2026Learning to Discover at Test Timecited by 94
  3. 2023AutoML-GPT: Automatic Machine Learning with GPTcited by 80
  4. 2024AutoKaggle: A Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous Data Science Competitionscited by 70
  5. 2023ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Codecited by 63
  6. 2024Large Language Model Agent for Hyper-Parameter Optimizationcited by 62
  7. 2025MLE-STAR: Machine Learning Engineering Agent via Search and Targeted Refinementcited by 52
  8. 2025MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 38
  9. 2025MLRC-Bench: Can Language Agents Solve Machine Learning Research Challenges?cited by 27
  10. 2024B-STaR: Monitoring and Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Self-Taught Reasonerscited by 26
  11. 2025Exploring LLM Agents for Cleaning Tabular Machine Learning Datasetscited by 20
  12. 2025Dynamic Speculative Agent Planningcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reward Models in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
  2. 2024Exploration-Driven Policy Optimization in RLHF: Theoretical Insights on Efficient Data Utilization
  3. 2024Towards Sample-Efficiency and Generalization of Transfer and Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Literature Review
  4. 2025Residual Policy Gradient: A Reward View of KL-regularized Objective
  5. 2023Stackelberg Batch Policy Learning
  6. 2025One Framework to Rule Them All: Unifying RL-Based and RL-Free Methods in RLHF
  7. 2025RLAF: Reinforcement Learning from Automaton Feedback
  8. 2023Reinforcement Learning with General Utilities: Simpler Variance Reduction and Large State-Action Space