TRACE: Single-Pass Decoding-Trace Risk Localization for Generation Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable confidence estimation is essential for large language model deployment. However, answer-level calibration remains challenging because generation errors are often localized: a response may be fluent and high-probability overall while still failing at a critical number, entity, or factual claim. Existing estimators compress token probabilities, sequence likelihoods, entropy, or beam statistics into a global score, which can dilute such local risk signals. We propose TRACE, a single-pass, decoded-answer-preserving confidence estimator that treats decoding-time uncertainty as a trajectory through three steps: (i) recording token-level surprisal and predictive entropy during decoding, (ii) applying local risk operators to preserve uncertainty spikes, and (iii) converting localized trace risk into answer-level confidence. TRACE produces a label-free risk score, while TRACE+ calibrates trace-only features into probabilities using a held-out split, without extra generations or external verifiers. We evaluate four tasks against 19 calibration baselines, and TRACE+ reduces Brier from 0.149 to 0.137 and improves AUROC from 0.758 to 0.792 over the strongest likelihood baseline. Across seven LLMs, TRACE+ improves over the best non-TRACE baseline pool from 0.136 to 0.120 Brier and from 0.764 to 0.817 AUROC. Results show that localizing decoding-time risk provides a general approach to calibration.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
- 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 445
14 more
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2019MLQA: Evaluating Cross-lingual Extractive Question Answeringcited by 340
- 2020Calibration of Pre-trained Transformerscited by 315
- 2024LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Querycited by 82
- 2024MARS: Meaning-Aware Response Scoring for Uncertainty Estimation in Generative LLMscited by 46
- 2024Do Not Design, Learn: A Trainable Scoring Function for Uncertainty Estimation in Generative LLMscited by 23
- 2025Semantic Volume: Quantifying and Detecting both External and Internal Uncertainty in LLMscited by 20
- 2024Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence Measurecited by 18
- 2026EDIS: Diagnosing LLM Reasoning via Entropy Dynamicscited by 10
- 2026HALT: Hallucination Assessment via Log-probs as Time seriescited by 8
- 2022Useful Confidence Measures: Beyond the Max Scorecited by 7
- 2026Monitoring the Internal Monologue: Probe Trajectories Reveal Reasoning Dynamicscited by 5
- 2025Improving the Calibration of Confidence Scores in Text Generation Using the Output Distribution's Characteristicscited by 4
- 2026How Confident Is the First Token? An Uncertainty-Calibrated Prompt Optimization Framework for Large Language Model Classification and Understandingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.